043-02.pdf
ia-court-doe-v-indyke-no-120-cv-00484-(sdny-2020) Court Filing 3.8 MB • Feb 13, 2026
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JANE DOE,
Plaintiff,
v.
DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D.
KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the
ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, an individual,
Defendants.
Case No. 1:20-cv-00484-JGK
DECLARATION OF ROBERT S. GLASSMAN
ROBERT GLASSMAN, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, declares under penalty of perjury
that the following is true and correct:
1. I am an attorney at the law firm Panish, Shea & Boyle LLP and am admitted before
this Court. I represent Plaintiff Jane Doe in this matter.
2. I respectfully submit this Declaration in support of Plaintiff's Motion to Approve
Alternate Service Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e)(l).
3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 are true and correct copies of declarations provided
by process servers documenting five (5) unsuccessful attempts at service on Maxwell at addresses
associated with her in both Florida and New York: 116 E. 65th Street, New York, NY 10065; 457
Madison Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10022; 1000 Venetian Way, APT 801, Miami Beach,
FL 33139; 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, FL 33480; 20 E 66th ST, New York, NY 10065. My
office conducted extensive Internet searches on Maxwell's whereabouts to find the addresses at
which service was attempted.
4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of an email that my office
Case 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Document 43-2 Filed 05/27/20 Page 1 of 33
2
sent to gmax@ellmax.com on April 24, 2020 which attached a copy of the Complaint in this
matter (ECF No. 9) and the summons as to Ghislaine Maxwell (ECF No. 17). We did not receive a
response to that email, nor did we receive any indication that the email had not been delivered.
We also sent the same email to several other email addresses associated with Maxwell (namely,
hello@theterramarproject.org; gmaxwell@theterramarproject.org;
maxwellg@theterramarproject.org; ghislaine@theterramarproject.org;
gmax@theterramarproject.org; maxwell@theterramarproject.org;
ghislaine.maxwell@theterramarproject.org), but received no response.
5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of the April 2, 2020 letter
that my office sent to Maxwell 's attorney Laura A. Menninger of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman,
P.C. Enclosed in the letter is a copy of the Complaint in this matter (ECF No. 9) and the summons
as to Ghislaine Maxwell (ECF No. 17).
6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of a letter from Maxwell's
attorney Laura A. Menninger dated April 13, 2020 in which she indicated she is not authorized to
accept service on behalf of Maxwell.
7. Despite these enormous efforts, we have been unable to effectuate service on
Maxwell.
8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the order issued by this
Court in Ransome v. Epstein, 2
018 WL 637421, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2018), in which the Court
found service upon Maxwell to be impracticable and approved Plaintiff serving the complaint and
summons on Maxwell's attorneys as Haddon Morgan as an appropriate mode of alternative
service.
9. In the Farmer v. Indyke, et al., 1:19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF (S.D.N.Y.), which is
related to this case, the court granted alternate service in a text-only order issued on February 12,
2020 which appears as ECF No. 27 as follows: "ORDER granting 18 Motion to Approve Alternate
Service on Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Maxwell"). Plaintiff's motion is unopposed, and, based
on her representations regarding her inability to locate a current address for Maxwell despite
diligent efforts, the Court finds that Plaintiff has adequately demonstrated that personal service
Case 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Document 43-2 Filed 05/27/20 Page 2 of 33
3
would be impracticable. See Ransome v. Epstein, No. 17cv616 (JGK), 2018 WL 637421, at *1
(S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2018). This Court further finds that Plaintiff's provision of a copy of the
Summons and Complaint by email to Maxwell's counsel of record in another action before the
Court (Giuffre v. Maxwell, 15cv7433 (LAP)(S.D.N.Y.)), as well as to an email address publicly
associated with Maxwell (see Plaintiff's Memorandum (Dkt. 19), at 3), was reasonably calculated
to place Maxwell on notice of this suit and to constitute sufficient service under the circumstances.
No later than 2/14/20, Plaintiff is directed to serve Maxwell with a copy of this Text Order by the
same means (i.e., by email to Maxwell's counsel of record in the Giuffre case and to the email
address publicly associated with Maxwell), and to file proof of such service on the Docket of this
action. Maxwell may then have until 3/6/20 to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the
Complaint. (HEREBY ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman)(Text Only Order)
(Freeman, Debra) (Entered: 02/12/2020)."
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: May 27, 2020 _____________________________
Los Angeles, California Robert Glassman
Case 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Document 43-2 Filed 05/27/20 Page 3 of 33
~-zL
EXHIBIT 1
Case 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Document 43-2 Filed 05/27/20 Page 4 of 33
Case 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Document 43-2 Filed 05/27/20 Page 5 of 33
ATTORNEY
OR
PARTY
WITHOUT
ATTORNEY
(Norno,
Slato
Bar
numbor,
ond
address)
FOR
COURT
USE
ONLY
...
Robert
S Glassman.Esq
SBN:
Bar
No.269816
PANISH
SHEA
& BOYLE
LLP
11111
Santa
Monica
Blvd
Suite
700
GLORIA
CELL#
213-444-8132
Los
Angeles,
CA
90025
TaEPHONE
NO.:
(310)
4n-1700
FAX
NO.:
(310)
4n-1699
E-MAIL
ADDRESS
(Optional):
ATTORNEY
FOR
(Namol:
UNITED
STATED
DISTRICT·COURT
SOUTHERN
DISTRICT
OF
NEW
YORK
STREET
ADDRESS:
40
FOLEY
SQUARE
ROOM
435
CITY
AND
ZIP
COOE:
NEW
YORK,
NY
10007
REfERENCE
NUMBER:
HEARING DATE:
DOE/IN
DYKE
Plaintiff(s):
JANE
DOE
Defendant(s):
DARREN
K.
INDYKE,
et
al.
CASE
NUMBER
DECLARATION
OF
DILIGENCE
1
:20-cv-00484-JG
I received
the
within
assignment
for
filing
and/or
service
on
April
24,
2020
and
that
after
due
and
diligent
effort
I have
not
been
able
to
serve
said
person.I
attempted
service
on
this
servee
on
the
following
dates
and
times:
Servee:
Ghislaine
Maxwell
Documents:
COMPLAINT
FOR
DAMAGES;SUMMONS
IN
A CIVIL
ACTION;
Address:
457
Madison
Avenue
4th
Floor
New
York,
NY
10022
As
enumerated
below:
4/24/2020
-
7:40
PM
457
Madison
Avenue,
4th
Floor
Business
New
York,
NY
10022
Bad
address.
This
is a multi
dwelling
apartment
complex
under
the
name
of
Lotte
New
York.
Spoke
with
Jerry
Parker,
Security
Supervisor
for
the
building
who
informed
me
that
the
whole
building
is empty
at
this
lime
due
to
the
corona
virus.
No
one
is
currently
residing
here.
No
further
information
provided
nor
guard
would
confirm
nor
deny
if subject
resides
here.
County:
Registration
No.:
Nationwide
Legal,
LLC
1609
James
M
Wood
Blvd.
Los
Angeles,
CA
90015
I declare
under
penalty
of
perjury
under
the
laws
of
the
United
States
of America
that
I
am
over
the
age
o
18,
t a
party
to
this
action
and
that
the
foregoing
is
tr:
e
. This
declaration
was
executed
on
4/
DECLARATION
OF
DILIGENCE
Order#:
LA51503/D11Fonnalmdl
Case 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Document 43-2 Filed 05/27/20 Page 6 of
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- f7bddb1d-b057-4053-9dc0-891b360a3120
- Storage Key
- court-records/ia-collection/Doe v. Indyke, No. 120-cv-00484 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)/Doe v. Indyke, No. 120-cv-00484 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)/043-02.pdf
- Content Hash
- 2ccf26a544b253359f092fa6ea98d486
- Created
- Feb 13, 2026