EFTA00601796.pdf

SEARCY DENNEY •WEST PALM npeni rwrict SCAROLA ETALLABASSEP-OEMCE: 21,3 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33409 BARNHART THE TOWLE HOUSE 517 NOPMICAUIOUN STREET TALLAHASSEE. FL 3230 l•1231 P.O. BOX 36213 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 aft-SHIPLNA VIA EMAIL and CERTIFIED MAIL-RRQ June 14, 2012 MORAL-AS AT lAW: IOSAEYS StA EAKEROPANES Ton'a Haddad Coleman Es wire T. MAGMA BARNHART T PARCH' RIBS,II LAJRIE J. BROSS GARAI R CONEY w ces o onja a , P.A. 1181ENOA S. PLUMP MAR A/10 GARCIA 524 S Andrews Avenue, Suite 200N JAMES W. GIJSIAPSON. JACK P TOLL Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 DAVID K KELLEY, AIL CAMERON It KENWIN wi.LAms was' DARRYL L LEWIS' Jack A. Goldberger, Es. uire 11.1111All A. NORTON PATRON E. CAANLA/17 EDNARO V FECCI ‘101411 SCAROLA 'CHRISTIAN D. SEARCY Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 'JOHN A. SHIPt EY III CHRISTOPHER K. SPEED 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 BRA1P SJLLIVAN 241 KAREN E TERRY West Palm Beach, FL 33401 &AN 0 J ALPO Ill C. CALM R'ARM£RM pints wtCL Re: Edwards adv. Epstein 'EARL L DENNEY,it. Our File No.: 291874 SHAREHOLDERS •BOAR3 CERTIFIED Al CO A/MOTF13 Dear Ms. Coleman and Mr. Goldberger: UeIT1.CKY 7 MARYLAND • VASSEOEuSETTS E1ASSSSP111 The sworn testimony given today by Scott Rothstein has now confirmed far beyond ° NOV HAJAPSHRF 'tenJERSEY any doubt that Brad Edwards had no participation in and no knowledge of any use of • PROW • WASHNOTON 00 the legitimate claims that Mr. Edwards prosecuted against your admittedly guilty sex PAPALEOALS, offender client, Jeffrey Epstein. Indeed, you have had no reasonable basis to support VNINIAYMPTEXDA any contrary belief at any time in the past, but now even baseless suspicion has been RANDY M. 01.1FRESHE DAMON GRA10111 conclusively put to rest. JON 0.1401,1043 DENMANU. VI NIL LOONARO. JR, AMESPEW, LOPE The multiple withdrawals from Mr. Epstein's representation by your predecessors RECEIPT W.MC:HER VAMP PORGY KATHLEEN SUCH strongly suggest that even before Scott Rothstein's deposition, they recognized that it STEVE M SHIM 003241E St STARK would be unethical for them to continue to prosecute claims against Mr. Edwards that WALTER A STEIN had absolutely no evidentiary support and were intended from the outset to serve Jeffrey Epstein's extortionate purposes. While you may have chosen to turn a blind eye to that conclusion before, it is now inescapable. Notice that was previously given pursuant to F.S. §57.105 has proved to be no deterrent, and so I am obliged to inform you that if you choose to continue the EFTA00601796 Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq. Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Edwards adv. Epstein June 14, 2012 Page 2 prosecution of your pending claims in the face of the irrefutable proof of Bradley Edwards' total innocence of any wrongdoing, I have been authorized to initiate and vigorously prosecute claims against YOU and your law firms for malicious prosecution. In addition, I will take such other action as may be appropriate to address conduct that at this point will have far exceeded the bounds of ethical propriety. You have ten days in which to respond before we proceed as described. Bradley J. Edwards, Esquire at EFTA00601797