DOJ-OGR-00007285.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Extraction** **Case Information** * Case Number: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE * Document Number: 467 * Filed Date: 11/15/21 **Page Information** * Page Number: 106 of 158 * Page Number: 106 **Transcript** * **Q.**: And then the other one there was no transcript of; is that correct? * **A.**: That is correct. * **Q.**: In either of those cases -- well, let me put it the other way. In neither of those cases were you qualified as an expert on grooming, correct? * **A.**: Grooming is part of the dynamic, well established to be under the rubric of interpersonal violence, so it would fall into the category in which I was declared an expert. * **Q.**: That wasn't my question. My question was, in neither of those cases were you qualified as an expert in the subject, the specific subject of grooming, correct? * **A.**: Correct. * **THE COURT**: Did you testify about grooming in those instances? * **THE WITNESS**: I testified about grooming in one of those, and I testified about coercive control and dynamics in a relationship in another. * **Q.**: And how many times have you been actually deposed in your role as a forensic psychologist? * **A.**: I believe four. I'm not positive, but around that. * **Q.**: So in your capacity as a forensic psychologist, you've testified maybe six times; is that right? * **A.**: Correct. * **Q.**: OK. Now, as a forensic psychologist, you are typically **Footer Information** * **SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.** * **(212) 805-0300** * **DOJ-OGR-00007285**