DOJ-OGR-00017283.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Header:** * Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE * Document 769 * Filed 08/10/22 * Page 5 of 19 * 3096 **Transcript:** LCLVMAXT 1. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, what about "3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit." 2. admitted exhibit." 3. MR. PAGLIUCA: If the Court is considering that, I think there needs to be a second sentence, which is, "The testimony about 3505-005 has been provided in the transcript." 4. MS. COMEY: That's redundant, your Honor. They know that; that's why they are asking the question. So I don't think it's necessary. 5. MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, it can't really hurt if it's redundant, your Honor. 6. THE COURT: That's true. 7. I'm just writing it out. 8. "3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit. The testimony regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript you have regarding Carolyn's testimony." 9. MR. PAGLIUCA: That's fine with us, your Honor. 10. MS. COMEY: Fine with us, your Honor. Thank you. 11. THE COURT: Okay. I'm happy to bring them out and do it orally or send in a note for efficiency. 12. MS. COMEY: I think sending in a note will save time, your Honor, and makes sense. 13. MR. PAGLIUCA: We agree. 14. THE COURT: Okay. So let me just be clear. 15. I'm going to say: I received your note regarding -- I'll just say regarding 3505-005. 3505-005 is not an admitted **Footer:** SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00017283