DOJ-OGR-00018913.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Extraction** **Case Information** * Case Number: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE * Document Number: 755 * Filed Date: 08/10/22 * Page Number: 51 of 262 **Header** * (At sidebar) **Text** 1. MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, this Amanda person was not noticed under 404(b). We had two that were noticed. As I recall, that's the Melissa and Virginia, and that's it. 2. MS. MENNINGER: Not just 404(b). 3. Your Honor ordered that the government produce to us the names of any victims that they intended to discuss at trial. They gave the names of six individuals; the four that we normally have been talking about, Ms. Roberts, and this last one. But Amanda was not one of the names that they gave. So if they intended to refer to her as a victim in this trial, the deadline to do that was, I think, in September. 4. MS. COMEY: Your Honor, yesterday during her testimony, Carolyn said that Amanda Lazlo was someone who she brought with her. I asked how old Amanda was, and she said how old she was. There was no objection. 5. MS. MENNINGER: She said 18. 6. MS. COMEY: This is corroborative -- I don't believe she said 18. This is corroborative testimony. And I would note -- 7. THE COURT: Well, the age distinction is an important question. It's entirely not corroborative in identifying a new victim if the testimony yesterday was 18. 8. MS. COMEY: And, your Honor, I would want to check the transcript for this. **Footer** * SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. * (212) 805-0300 * DOJ-OGR-00018913 **Note** * THE COURT: Well, the age distinction is an important question. It's entirely not corroborative in identifying a new victim if the testimony yesterday was 18.