DOJ-OGR-00017676.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Header** * Case Number: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE * Document Number: 745 * Filed Date: 08/10/22 * Page Number: 67 of 264 **Transcript Text** * specific -- * MS. MOE: Objection to form. * MS. MENNINGER: That was just admitted. I'm just laying the foundation for the next question. That was the last thing. * MS. MOE: Your Honor, I'm not sure what the question is. * THE COURT: You don't have a question yet. Go ahead. * BY MS. MENNINGER: * Q. Because you have no specific memory of your first time with Ghislaine in December of 2019, you have come up with that memory in the last two years, the one you gave yesterday, correct? * MS. MOE: Objection to form. * THE COURT: Overruled. * A. I come up with -- I don't believe I've come up with a memory, no. * Q. Well, you gave a memory to the jury yesterday that you didn't have in December of 2019, right? * A. I don't recall. * Q. You then later met with the government in February of 2020, right? * A. Right. * Q. And what you told the government in February of 2020 is that the first time you were involved with Ghislaine, there **Footer Information** * SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. * Phone Number: (212) 805-0300 * DOJ-OGR-00017676 **Additional Notes** * The document appears to be a transcript of a court proceeding, likely related to a criminal case involving Ghislaine Maxwell. The conversation between the prosecutor (MS. MENNINGER) and the defendant (MS. MOE) revolves around the defendant's memory of their first encounter with Ghislaine in December 2019. The defendant objects to the line of questioning, citing a lack of specific memory, and the court overrules the objection. The defendant then provides a response, stating that they don't recall meeting with the government in February 2020. The conversation continues, with the prosecutor asking follow-up questions and the defendant providing additional information.