DOJ-OGR-00021745.pdf

Case 22-1426, Document 87, 07/27/2023, 3548202, Page3 of 35 C. The District Court Abused Its Discretion in Imposing Unreasonable Limitations on the Range of Questions it Agreed to Pose to Juror 50 at the Post-Verdict Hearing....................19 D. Juror 50's Actual, Implied, and Inferable Bias Was Established..............................................22 POINT III (Point V in Appellant's Principal Brief) THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN SENTENCING MS. MAXWELL.......................................................26 CONCLUSION....................................................................................27 ii DOJ-OGR-00021745