EFTA00727993.pdf
dataset_9 pdf 85.2 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 1 pages
Marks letter is filled with inaccuracies, misrepresentations,and a misunderstanding
of the work release requirements policies and procedures. It is a confused document
that contains an additional attempt to influence the sheriffs office.. Please note , that
unlike the first email and meeting this letter is address to captain Sleeth, after being
turned down by the colonel that she met with theist time, she simpluy went below
him ..
To illustrate how far she will go to sow confusion, she points to the fact that the
person who filled in the application for the florida science foundation , thought she
is well aaware the Rich Icahn is my controller, suggests, that another man of the
same name that she probably found in a lawyers guide, is somehow involved in this
filing is ludicrous. She simply puts that a mr kahn is a prtner of Sullivan and
Cromwell, a large new york firm to which I have no connection whatsoever she
writes that mr kahn gave jack goldbergers address on the form.. the director fo the
foundation MR mr Kahn filled out the forms, and used jacks phone number as we
didn't yet have a local phone. She stresses he sugned under threat of perjury..
She goes on to say that I only worked an hour a week in the past, as an intimation
that somehow, before when I had a large business, I should devote the same time or
receive the same compensation is insane. I used to travel around the world , had
24/7 telephone access, and many business interests. To now suggest that somehow
that shouldn't change is indicative of her random attacks. She then suggests that
judge Pucillo, who is a retired judge was sitting in for the Mc Sorleys absence.. She
fails to metion that she marie was in the courtroom during the plea.. There was no
objections at a "hearing" as there was an agreed plea. To suggest otherwise serves
only to confuse. The sheriffs office, reviewed this thoroughly.
Though she concedes its in the sheriffs discretion, and then says the girls might
want to be included in an exclusionary zone, she makes the argument that even
though she is aware that the sheriffs department took a very conservative view, ) I
was required to stay in solitary for three months. ( with a perfect record). She
claims that the charges to which I plead guilty should somehow disqualify me.
First , there are many sex offender charges that are eleigible for both work release
and house arrest. It is ONLY violent sex charges that are ineligible. They are fully
delineated, in the requirements. 796.03 though the procuring a minor was discussed
in detail with the work release office, it is not a prohibited charge. In addtion the
three violations of a 796 charge is three sepreate arrests. The word violation is used
because there is mandatory Pre Trial Intervention for the charge I plea guilty to,
and therefore no record at the end of the sentence. The original language was two
guilty in ten years, now three violations in 5. The fact is there was only one arrest.
The three violations are to to halt recidivism. Otherwise any prostitute who had
more than one johm ( the vast majority of the caes) would be ineleigible with one
arrest
EFTA00727993
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- cebd9f38-c8a1-4f65-86bd-d2678346c127
- Storage Key
- dataset_9/EFTA00727993.pdf
- Content Hash
- dd74b130e42e092c9103abda1e547746
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026