EFTA00689666.pdf
dataset_9 pdf 133.6 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 2 pages
From: Brad Edwards
To: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>
Subject: Re:
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:35:29 +0000
Again....with the fees and costs that I owe that offer is not even close to enticing.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 25, 2015, at 7:44 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation®gmail.com> wrote:
we both agreed i am the underdog in the 4th, as they will be in conflict with themselves. . so if you now say
no sc. then , I would propose you pay me 100k if i win and I pay you a million if i lose. - dersh is my time, no
financial risk to me. still i would like to get it settled or delayed „ cvra , is not the ethical as much as the pr.
and judge reaction. i appreciate you taking the time to try to work it out. .
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Brad Edwards < > wrote:
(1) I don't control that call completely. Everyone on my side has wanted the depos since January and they
are finally happening. (2) that case either settles or it doesn't. There is nothing complicated about it. There is
nothing that needs more time. I'm being more than reasonable in the offer to settle that case. I do not want
that case to turn into our case - where it goes on for years. We take these depos, add punitives, then get a trial.
And it ends. Once and for all.
If it is the other case that is driving the delay, I don't understand that. Clearly one case has nothing to do with
the other. And really, considering the facts of that case I could not be more reasonable than I am being there
also. I feel like on one hand you say you want a global settlement. That is fine with me so we have tried to
work toward that end. But the reality is that you want me to agree to some unreasonable deal.
If we think about the cases, and what was alleged, I'm crazy to be considering the numbers we are talking
about. Juries will render multi-million dollar verdicts for me and I believe over $20m. I know you say my
reputation has not been harmed. But that's not true. I've done good work to overcome and mitigate the
damage but between you and Dersh considerable damage was done.
Fair resolution on that case- option one - payment to me of $5 m inclusive of fees and costs or option two
some ratio idea based on the 4th decision. Anything beyond that point adds too many variables and defeats
the point.
CVRA I talked to an ethics expert and the previous offer would be acceptable. Would have to fine-tune it hut
overall it's fine.
I know you share my feeling about not wasting time, and I appreciate your trying to get the best deal
possible. But at this point, we are either going to reach an agreement or agree to disagree.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:19 AM, Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
EFTA00689666
dersh people are telling me that a depo delay , needs to happen by today. if we are going to get it settled. .
your call, but i see little downside in you agreeing. that being said . i also understand your position. and
make no reps on his behalf. .
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00689667
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- ccaeb614-6878-440b-993a-8e7c969f7ccd
- Storage Key
- dataset_9/EFTA00689666.pdf
- Content Hash
- c85daed350236272cda0c682644b80ba
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026