DOJ-OGR-00018465.pdf

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 128 of 261 1289 LC6VMAX4 1 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I would just say that it is not being offered for the truth; it's offered for the fact that she maintained contact with him at a time later than the matters in issue and, therefore, it has relevance. 2 THE COURT: That's the truth, what you just said. 3 It's being offered for the truth that she had contact. 4 MS. STERNHEIM: Well, that part is not hearsay. The content is hearsay. The fact of the contact itself is something else. That's my understanding of it. 5 THE COURT: Well, okay. She said she emailed with him. If you want to redact the content and show that there were emails, I suppose that's another question. But if you're not -- you want the content, which is consistent with what she testified to. 6 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, I want the dates. 7 THE COURT: Okay. 8 MS. STERNHEIM: And that is not hearsay. 9 THE COURT: All right. So the dates then I would permit -- I'll hear the government's response to this, but with the content redacted. 10 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, I'd like to check the transcript, because I thought she had agreed to the dates. And so -- 11 THE COURT: She did. 12 MS. POMERANTZ: So this seems cumulative, your Honor. 13 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00018465