Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 122-cv-10904 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)/263-28.pdf
usvi-v-jpmorgan Court Filing 671.2 KB • Feb 12, 2026
EXHIBIT 81
FILED UNDER SEAL
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 263-28 Filed 08/07/23 Page 1 of 5
GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES
VIRGIN ISLANDS, DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
Plaintiff, SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF NEW YORK
v.
Case No. 22-cv-10904-JSR
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES EDWARD STALEY,
Third-Party Defendant.
Expert Report of Special Agent Joseph Fonseca, FBI (Retired)
on behalf of
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
June 23, 2023
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 263-28 Filed 08/07/23 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 263-28 Filed 08/07/23 Page 3 of 5
progra ms designed to identify the transfer of child sexual abuse material, additionally
known as chi
ld pornography.
8. I have investigated cases involving t h e trnnspo1i and exploitation of women and
children across the U.S. border, state lines, an d in
oth er countries. I have had the
oppo1iunity to assist in the prosecution of more than 100 sexual exploitation cases, with
many
culminating in trials.
9. I have trained with numerous foreign law enforcement offi cers and learned of different
trafficking techniques to gain
an understanding how ce1iain trafficking crimes and
crimes against children can be investigated and prosecuted in the U.S. I have
investigated these trafficking an d crimes against children cases with the assistance of
finan cial r ecords obtained from businesses (hotels, car rental companies, apaiiment
complexes, etc.), financial institutions , money providers (companies such as Western
Union and MoneyGrain), and prepaid debit
cai·ds (such as GreenDot).
10. In 2021, I finished my FBI cai·eer as a Counselor for n
ew agent trainees at the FBI
Academy in Quantico, Virginia.
11.
Iain being compensated for my review, analysis, and time in this case at a rate of
$125.00 per hour.
12. My compensation is not contingent upon offer
ing any specific opinions or on th e
outcome
of this matter.
Summary of Opinions:
13. I was engaged by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Don LLP (Counsel), counsel for
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N .A. (JPMC or the Bank) to provide an expe1i opinion and
potentially expe1i test
imony in th e matter of Government of the United States Virgin
Islands
v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA., No. 22-cv-10904 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.) (the Epstein
Liti
gation).
14. I have reviewed the Second Amended Complaint filed by the Government
of the United
States Virgin Islan ds (USVI) in this case and understand that it alleges that JPMC
intentionally obstm cted the federal government 's enforcement oft~he Traffickin
Victims Protection Act 18 U.S.C. 1591, against Jeffrey Epstein
an d "pen nitting" Epste
in to wit ·aw ai·ge
am ounts • s . Counsel re uested that I rovide an o inion
15. In my opinion, based on my review of the mater
ials identified in Appendix B to this
Repo1i and my yeai·s
of experience investigating crimes against children and sex
trafficking cases as a Special Agent
for the FBI, one or more additional SARs related to
Epstein fi led by JPMC wou
ld not have resulted in an eai·lier arrest of Epstein nor would
1
Second Amended Complaint, ,r,r 147- 168, Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A., No. 22-cv-10904 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.), Dkt. No. 120.
4
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 263-28 Filed 08/07/23 Page 4 of 5
. My conclusion is infonned by the allegations
about Epstein's conduct, paiticularly the allegations about his use
of relatively small
am ounts of cash to compensate women for sexual experiences, the evidence available
to investi
gators in their investigation into Epstein from 2005-2008, publicly available
infonnation about Epstein that law enforcement would have been aware of, including
alle ations
in the media about his conduct
16. To begin with, over the
course of my career, I have never relied on a SAR while
investigating a person on charges of sex trafficking. The simple reason for this is due
to the victim-center
ed approach the FBI utilizes when conducting an investigation into
sex trafficking.
17.
The victim-centered approach to investigating sex trafficking cases focuses on making
sure the victim feels safe, secure, and stable. Once victims
ai·e safely recovered and
support
ed, they ai·e then able to provide the most impo1tant piece of evidence in a sex
trafficking case - their testimony. Victim testimony is essential to describe the manner
and method
of a victim's trafficking, the relevant details of their exploitation and abuse,
a
nd anything of value given to or received by any person for a sex act by the victim. In
the typical sex traffi
cking case, investigators would then work to find the best evidence
to conoborate the various aspects of the victim
's testimony in order to prove sex
trafficking-related chai·ges.
18. Based on my experience
as an FBI SA, SARs are not useful in sex trafficking or crimes
aga
inst children investigations because they ai·e unlikely to directly conoborate a
victim
's testimony or provide evidence of the sex trafficking of a victim. Without
direction from a vict
im alleging the existence of a trafficking operation and describing
the manner and method
of payment in a way that reasonably matches the transaction
activity that potentially could be fl agged in a SAR, law enforcement would be unable to
detennine whether a cash or wire transaction that ma be re 01ted in a SAR was related
to an traffickin activi .
19. It is also my opinion that
investigators have an obligation to affiimatively recover
evidence they believe is relevant to their investigation. As such,
if the FBI had
continued to
investigate Epstein's conduct following his Florida state conviction in
June 2008, and belie
ved that farther evidence of his financial activity was relevant to
that investi ation there was enou h info1mation available to
law enforcement both
an m t e pu 1c recor to a ow mvestigators
to evaluate Epstein's activity and, more impo1tantly, to know that they should look to
JPMC as a source
of additional financial infonnation if they felt it was necessaiy.
Specifically, the FBI would have known at all times after 2008 that it could send a
2
I have also reviewed, relied upon, and agree with the conclusions in the expe1t repo1t of Teresa A. Pesce.
5
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 263-28 Filed 08/07/23 Page 5 of 5
Signature
I declare, under the penalty of perjury, under the laws of the United States of America, that the
foregoing
is true and correct. Signed this 23rd day of June, 2023:
25
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- c32273c3-058a-4b24-b537-017cedfd39d0
- Storage Key
- court-records/usvi-v-jpmorgan/Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 122-cv-10904 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)/263-28.pdf
- Content Hash
- 1bb6eb63fffc1b917947298fc9f894a6
- Created
- Feb 12, 2026