DOJ-OGR-00010079.pdf

C2GFDAU3 Edelstein 339 1 Bronxville, but the same phone number. 2 Q. You would agree with me, would you not, that that's the 3 very same computer research over the course of a couple of 4 minutes that you could have done on May 12th, right? 5 A. Well, one could have done that on May 12th. We didn't have 6 Ms. Conrad's phone number on May 12. 7 Q. So the answer is yes, you could have done that research on 8 May 12th, right? 9 A. I could have done a Google search -- 10 Q. Was there something unintelligible about my question? 11 MR. SCHECTMAN: There's nothing unintelligible about 12 the answer, if you would allow the witness to finish. 13 THE COURT: Overruled. 14 Q. Could you answer? Could you have done that research on 15 May 12? 16 A. No. I can explain. 17 Q. Well, you were informed there was a Catherine Conrad 18 suspension report by Theresa Trzaskoma, correct? 19 A. No. 20 Q. Didn't Theresa Trzaskoma tell you that she had seen 21 evidence that there was a suspended New York attorney named 22 Catherine Conrad? Didn't you just tell that to us a few 23 minutes ago? 24 A. No. What I said was she had told me there was a suspended 25 lawyer with the name Catherine Conrad. She did not mention a SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00010079