DOJ-OGR-00016465.pdf

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 249 of 267 2277 LCAVMAX8 you're in a position at this point to make those disclosures as if it is that person, so I did expect a full disclosure. What is the defense's anticipation as to length of case? MR. PAGLIUCA: I would say -- I'm going to guess no more than four days, more likely two to three, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. All right. So I think then -- and then we should talk about the timing of the charge conference. Have you discussed that further? You kept promising to discuss it. MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. We haven't conferred with the defense about that. We continue to just defer to the Court's preference on timing. I think if the defense case is two to three days, then a charge conference at the conclusion of that would fit with the Court's timing. We're also happy to do that earlier. We don't have a preference as to the sequencing there. THE COURT: Let me just look at the calendar. Go ahead, Ms. Sternheim. MS. STERNHEIM: I was just going to suggest that we utilize the Saturday that the Court said would be available. Even if we had more of a case, I think we could accomplish that, if the Court is still amenable. THE COURT: Okay. That's fine with me. MS. MOE: No objection to that, your Honor. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016465