EFTA00855993.pdf
dataset_9 pdf 275.2 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 5 pages
From: "jeffrey E." Gjeevacationggmail.corn>
To: Cecile de Jongh >
Subject: Re: Fw: Fwd: Bridge - Tibbar
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:51:18 +0000
no interst
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Cecile de Jongh c > wrote:
FYI the below email thread. If there is no interest in this, please let me know so I can pass the answer along to
Sebastiano. Thanks.
With warm regards,
Cecile
On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:06AM, Sebastiano Paiewonsky Cassinelli ca wrote:
Cecile:
We wanted to share the email thread below. While we suggest that the ask remains at $3.5M the
option for less exists as more fully outlined below.
Many thanks.
Seb
Sebastiano Paiewonsky-Cassinelli
AH Riise
37 Main Street/M. Box 6280
St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands 00804
(cell and text)
(office)
Begin forwarded message:
Sent from my iPhone
On May 26, 2015, at 9:55 PM, Sebastiano Paiewonsky Cassinelli
wrote:
I personally think $2.25M could get us very close to closing and I can discuss why. The partial
amount will jump start everything.
EFTA00855993
Alternatively, if we are able to raise $1M to $1.5M now this could get us very close to determining
whether we can put the SBLC structure in place with the fund eliminating the need for further
bridge. Brandon believes we could finalize this option within 4 to 6 weeks (assuming the fund
wants to move forward and it had expressed a strong interest in the project).
We need $3.5M to close but smaller tranches would mean everything and if we hit agreed
milestones and continued to reduce risk by doing so additional funds could be released.
On May 26, 2015, at 7:51 PM, " <
wrote:
Seb,
Aaron and I go through payables non-stop and we all know what it will take to close and $3.5M
is definitely the minimum. The only reason we COULD accept less is if we know first what the
party is willing to contribute - $2M? $3M? and then we can start going to WAPA or VIPA or
whomever to try to negotiate waiting. However, not something we want to risk and do unless
we have someone at the table saying for example that they cannot put in more than $2M.
SBLC would take longer than 4-6 weeks. None of us know exactly how long but 1100%
guarantee it will be more than 4-6 weeks.
Therefore, Aaron's reference below to tranches makes sense. The way to present is the party
could do a $1.5M tranche initially and then we see if we go the SBLC route or not. This gives
us time to travel down that road and the money to do it. Then within 2-3 weeks we should
have a clearer picture.
From talking to other investors, no one wants to put in only $1.5M when they know we really
need $3.5M to close. They want to understand how we are getting the rest of the funds
needed. I wish we needed less but the reality is $3.5M to ensure getting to the closing table
and this is the truth. We don't want to negotiate against ourselves here and risk closing.
If you feel tomorrow that $1.5-$2M is the limit at this time, I would suggest the tranche and
once this party is in, they will want to help us get to the finish line.
Warm Regards,
Tania Tomyn
CEO/President
Office
Cell
Follow and Like us on Facebook!
s .,cid:image001.jpg@O1
CDA578.B7EF1510
From: Sebastiano Paiewonsky Cassinelli [mailto
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 7:36 PM
EFTA00855994
To:
Cc: Jon Chipps
Subject: Re: Bridge
I know you are exhausted but I really need for Mark or yourself to comb the payables.
if we get the SBLC deal in place in 4-6 weeks, what level of bridge? $1M? $1.5M? $2M$
if no SBLC, $2M?
Sebastiano Paiewonsky-Cassinelli
AH Riise
37 Main Street.M. Box 6280
St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands 00804
cell and text)
office)
Sebastiano Paiewonsky-Cassinelli
AH Riise
37 Main Street.M. Box 6280
St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands 00804
(cell and text)
(office)
Begin forwarded message:
From: '
Date: May 26, 2015 at 7:30:09 PM AST
To: Sebastiano Paiewonsk Cassinelli <
Cc: " "< >,
>, Jon Chipps
Subject: RE: Bridge
Yes maybe but remember we have couple million in payables we are hardly touching and we
will have to put these fires out until close.
We should get all we can from him. If he will only give us $3M we will deal with it or less or
more.
WAPA is $200k Bond
WAPA Legal $75k (This really can't be stalled)
VIPA Bond $260k
The question is can we do it for less I don't think so. However, if you guy gives us $2.5 or $3M
we will get the rest somehow it will be easier to borrow as we get closer to close. In reality
things have been delayed so each month the bridge needs grow by about $150. Again we will
deal with that. Usually if they will give $2.5M he would prefer to give the full $3.5 or more to
make sure we get closed but it has hurdles we need to meet. We can't change the number it's
only going up not down. We can borrow it later easier once the project is moving forward with
EFTA00855995
the first chunk of bridge.
If your guy needed to invest in tranches that is fine as well. Maybe $1.5 up front then $750k a
month as long as we meet hurdles reducing his risk and helping us get there.
That should give you what you need.
Aaron Smith
Cell
Fax
"Like" on Facebook
St.Croix, USVI Office
Las Vegas Offices
Original Message
From: Sebastiano Paiewonsky Cassinelli [mailto:
Sent: Tuesda Ma 26, 2015 7:11 PM
To:
Cc: Jon Chipps
Subject: Re: Bridge
Any other opportunities to whittle the amount down and stretch it out to closing?
Sebastiano Paiewonsky-Cassinelli
AH Riise
37 Main Street/M. Box 6280
St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands 00804
cell and text)
(office)
On May 26, 2015, at 6:33 PM, " wrote:
500k.
Aaron Smith
Tibbar Energy USVI LLC
Original message
From: Sebastiano Paiewonsky-Cassinelli tza
Date: 05/26/2015 6:25 PM (GMT-05:00)
EFTA00855996
To:
Jon Chipps
Subject: Re: Bridge
If I get WAPA and VIPA to agree to take payment for the bonds at the closing of the
construction loan, by how much will this reduce the $3.5M bridge amount?
Need to know this prior to tomorrow's meeting.
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00855997
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- b944d87a-0d32-48d6-9f98-3c7856fcbab2
- Storage Key
- dataset_9/EFTA00855993.pdf
- Content Hash
- 5941eaa9e7a690390c9a66cd4610c77c
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026