DOJ-OGR-00013536.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Header** * **Case Number:** 1:20-cr-00330-PAE * **Document Number:** 755 * **Filed Date:** 08/10/22 * **Page Number:** 258 of 262 * **Year:** 1969 **Case Text** 1. for the charging conference makes sense and is feasible. And 2. in any event, I'll hear your motion at the close of the case. 3. It may mean -- so the result may be that the jury has 4. Friday in addition to Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, if 5. everybody's comfortable with that. Yes. Okay. 6. MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. 7. THE COURT: All right. That's helpful. 8. I'll let you know. Obviously if the charging 9. conference is Friday, I'll have to get you the charge before 10. Friday, which is possible. It may not be a lot before Friday. 11. MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we're happy to accommodate 12. the Court's schedule on the charge. If you'd prefer to do it 13. Saturday, I just -- 14. THE COURT: I don't have a preference. I just wanted 15. to make that available to the parties because it can be 16. difficult, I know, to review the charge as trial is proceeding. 17. So I'm not sure I have a preference. Go ahead. 18. MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, we're simply trying not to 19. waste the Friday. But, to be honest, the charge is obviously 20. very important and is going to require some careful review. So 21. we'll defer to the Court on what makes the most sense. But we 22. could do it on Friday if the Court wants to take advantage of 23. the day, but I think it would probably make more sense to do it 24. at a later day and we'll make ourselves available. 25. THE COURT: Okay. **Footer** * **Southern District Reporters, P.C.** * **Phone Number:** (212) 805-0300 * **Case Number:** DOJ-OGR-00013536