496.pdf
ia-court-epstein-v-rothstein-no-50-2009-ca-040800-xxxx-mb-(fla-15 Court Filing 129.1 KB • Feb 13, 2026
NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
and BRADLEY
J, EDWARDS,
individually.
Defendants.
I
-------------
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN
AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA
CASE NO.
502009CA04080QXXJqMBAG
-,.,~-,;::;,
r-·; ;::;
:3:~ (_.
nc:,S'. c::
:ijrn.,__ -:e
oJ::>-;G -
c:n·
~:.C'.2 .s:-•
s~r ~
-·_; r9
PLAINTIFF JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ::· . . s:-
MOTION FOR AN ENLARGMENT OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO M-EDIA<t"E
Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and
pursuant to Rule 1.090(b)
of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby requests this
Honorable Court for an enlargement
of time of ninety (90) days within which to comply
with the Court's order or mediation. As grounds therefore, Epstein would state:
I. At Plaintiffs request, this Court entered an Order on April 19, 2012
directing the parties to participate in Mediation within sixty ( 60) days; to wit: on or
before June
19, 2012.
2. Undersigned counsel was not counsel for Plaintiff on the date upon which
this Order was entered.
3. Undersigned counsel has been reviewing the volumes of documents that
have been produced in this case to date to prepare for all upcoming scheduled matters,
including Mediation, and to comply with other deadlines imposed by both the Court and
the
Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
4. Undersigned counsel has also been diligently preparmg for multiple
hearings on this case, including hearings scheduled for June
11, 2012 (which was
cancelled on June 10, 2012) and June
12, 2012, and multiple hearings in the ancillary
cases that are prevalent to this case.
5. Due to the busy schedules of the parties involved, including co-counsels,
the Plaintiff, the co-defendant and opposing counsels, undersigned counsel has been
NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
unable to coordinate the scheduling of the mediation within the time frame provided in
the Court Order.
6. Plaintiff is requesting an additional ninety (90) days within which to
comply with the Court Order.
7. This motion is being made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
8. Since Plaintiff was the party who requested the Mediation and is now
requesting an enlargement
of time, there is no prejudice suffered by an enlargement of
the time frame within which to comply.
9. Undersigned counsel has made a good faith attempt to confer with
opposing counsel for Mr. Edwards regarding the enlargement of time.
Wherefore, Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein requests this Honorable Court grant
Plaintiff's motion for enlargement
of time.
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served,
via electronic and US Mail, to all parties on the attached service list, this June 12, 2012.
Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.
Florida Bar No.: 176737
Tonja Haddad, PA
524 South Andrews A venue
Suite 200N
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
954.467 .1223
954.337.3716 (facsimile)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NOT A CERTIFIED COPY
SERVICE LIST
CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
Jack Scarola, Esq.
Searcy Denney Scarola et al.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Jack Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury, Goldberger, & Weiss, PA
250 Australian Ave. South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Marc Nurik, Esq.
1 East Broward Blvd.
Suite 700
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Bradley
J. Edwards, Esq.
Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman
425 N Andrews Avenue
Suite 2
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
Lilly Ann Sanchez, Esq.
LS Law Firm
Four Seasons Tower
15th Floor
1441 Brickell A venue
Miami, Florida 33131
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- b4742161-c688-4e06-87d7-7dd5ab61aa6d
- Storage Key
- court-records/ia-collection/Epstein v. Rothstein, No. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. 2009)/Epstein v. Rothstein, No. 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MB (Fla. 15th Cir. Ct. 2009)/496.pdf
- Content Hash
- f54c1c8c2a71b104d5163645bb7c1aa1
- Created
- Feb 13, 2026