DOJ-OGR-00007231.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Extraction** **Case Information:** * Case Number: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE * Document Number: 467 * Filed Date: 11/15/21 **Page Information:** * Page Number: 52 of 158 * Page Size: 52 **Text Extraction:** 1. provided data supporting that this is a process that is well 2. known and well established in the literature, and then it 3. pointed to directions that were needed for future work. It 4. pointed to some of the concerns about definitions and things 5. that -- suggestions, basically, for issues that needed to be 6. addressed in future research. 7. Q. Do you agree with all of the conclusions of this article? 8. A. I do not. 9. Q. I want to direct your attention to Page 959. And I want to 10. zoom in on the paragraph above current definitions. It's about 11. four lines down. It starts with "Furthermore." 12. A. Okay. 13. MS. POMERANTZ: We can highlight those next two sentences. 14. Q. Dr. Rocchio, could you review the highlighted text. 15. A. Okay. 16. MS. POMERANTZ: And for purposes of the record, your Honor, I'm happy to read that. 17. THE COURT: The sentence beginning with "Furthermore" and ending with "negatives." 18. MS. POMERANTZ: Thank you, your Honor. 19. BY MS. POMERANTZ: 20. Q. Dr. Rocchio, what is your reaction to this? 21. A. I think it's incomplete and I disagree with the conclusion. 22. Q. Can you explain? **Additional Information:** * Footer: SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 * DOJ-OGR-00007231 **Note:** The extracted text is presented in a plain text format, preserving the original formatting as much as possible. Any handwritten notes or unclear text have been included in brackets for clarity.