EFTA01302111.pdf

would then be asking for a TOTAL declination. ( if he talks about appeal., waivers, 1 think that is a non. starter but does he want to send you a proposed set of facts, to which we would have to stipulate. I.1 realize that emotions are running high on both of our sides. But if You take a step back, which I again strongly urge you to do. 1 think you'll agree that our current proposal , while not what we, would ultimately want , nor what you would have preferred- is currently the best overall solution, for both of us. I think it is fair and just. Id like you to think about it, and I suggest we postpone setting up any firm meeting date until tomorrow, after you have had ample time to review the current situation and circumstances and reconsider, the possibility of getting this, complex matter firmly and totally. behind us. rdays call. I wanted to give you time to Alex, I wanted to have a one on one conversation re yeste the New York Times. . I'm sure you now realize confirm for yourself what Lily had represented regarding actions as merely third party hearsay, I that contrary to the characterization of David weinstein's what trans pired. Proof positive of a breach of the wanted you to know that we have proof positive of h of the local rules of conduct„ I can't represent to you U.S. attorneys manual, proof positive of a breac we have proof beyond a reasonable doubt of a 6 e violation, but clearly enough facts that would detai ls of our plea negotiations, ( personal security and house support a charge. . Alex, David discussed ssed rn with the Palm beach post editorial. He discu arrest), after repeatedly voicing the offices conce 1591 multiple charging statues, even includ ing the the theory of the case , and talked about the statute , of sex trafficking -.that , to put it mildly, is outraged . He is a is paten tly unfai r to Mr. Epstein. . Frankly, as you heard yeste man of great faith- both in his religi on and his unwa verin rday, Ken g belief opir) , and the us attorn eys manu al. He s, the king james version in the system of justice. He has two bible His fear is that the Bob he believes it has failed ,mise rably . believes in the system, and in this case rding our propo sal, I to be a rubber stamp for the office . Rega Seniors review, is merely designed you telling me of ,as you a highly princ ipled position. Yesterday, I appreciated believe we have taken we get if we achieved a looked at the case. And said , what would put it, your thought process. You the victims would be allowed n, we would have a jail sentence and conviction. We would have registratio Jeffrey E. Epstein . process , with every plea negotiation that would be your very thought to sue under 2255. I recognize cution, Had Epste in had traffic ked in clearly in the heartland of prose Had you had the statutes that were . You would have asked the same in the most common of stings women , had Epstein been caught own to you at the time of that thoug ht new facts in this case, facts unkn questions. However, the time , you were unaw are of changed that landscape. . At the process , have dramatically dures, you were were unaware of disregard for published proce misrepresentations. , you YOu were unware of the missing Brady info. gerated list of victims. You were unaware of the wildly exag conduct -weinsteins intera ctions with troubling breach of prosecutorial certainly unaware of the most resea rched every S, AND THE LAW We have , BASED ON THE NEW FACT the new York times. That aside this isn't the case in which attem pt such a are none that comes close.. case previously brought.. there need to debate whet her or not the petite needs to be revisited WE don't stretch.- the initial decision than disappearance in the documents. I e and its prominent appearanc a policy actually applies, and only as an advoc ate but as sider our proposal. Not d enco urage you however to seriously recon ted this will bring total woul my word that, if it is accep you to accept it . You have you understand. I have colleague, I strongly urge ic ancillary issues--. I'm sure g and extre mely probl emat months closure to all outstandin t lead to months and prefe r not to begin creating a record, that migh big change I 'd have to explain such a not sent you a letter as fully realize that you will ent. . That being said, I The peop le ct. of contentious argum back you have to prote cons tituen ts —The FBI and the people whose than the state is to your two main be getting much more They could be assured that You would sal is both that worked on this case. dent that our propo made whole. I'm confi - The victims would be the fed statutes would have to be still willing to accept. you recog nize that fair. The cond uct is state conduct, misco nduc t with the press principled,and the recent issues re fear that , if this is not resolved quickly, in eithe r of our intere sts. tortured to fit. I think that would be torna do of trouble. And frankly I don't convi nce eithe r Bob Senio r or will draw us into a to IF Alan Dersh owitz , and Ken, are able we ( I think this is a middle ground. , fed statutes don't apply, ns openess-that the more confi dence in Washingto Washington - I have EFTA01302111