Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 122-cv-10904 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)/265-71.pdf
usvi-v-jpmorgan Court Filing 179.6 KB • Feb 12, 2026
EXHIBIT 195
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 265-71 Filed 08/07/23 Page 1 of 5
Confidential – Subject to Protective Order
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Government of the United States Virgin
Islands,
Plaintiff,
vs.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
Defendant.
/
CASE NO.: 1:22-cv-10904 (JSR)
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMC”) hereby serves its Responses and
Objections to Plaintiff’s First Request for Admissions (“Requests”) pursuant to Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure 26 and 36. JPMC denies all Requests, except with respect to anything expressly
admitted herein.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
These objections and responses are made solely for the purposes of the above-captioned
case. Each of JPMC’s objections and responses to the Requests is based on information and
documents presently available to JPMC after reasonable and diligent inquiry. Particularly with
respect to (but in no way limited to) Request Nos. 20, 27, 170, 172, 186, and 189, JPMC’s
responses are also based on Mr. Dimon’s current recollection of events. Discovery is ongoing,
and JPMC specifically reserves the right to amend or supplement its objections and responses as
necessary, including in the event further information and documents are discovered or produced
by JPMC after discovery has been completed. In addition, JPMC’s objections and responses are
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 265-71 Filed 08/07/23 Page 2 of 5
Confidential – Subject to Protective Order
9
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 8
In addition to and specifically incorporating its foregoing General Objections and
Objections to Definitions, JPMC objects to Request No. 8 because it does not specify a relevant
time frame for when “Epstein referred Glenn Dubin.” JPMC also objects to Request No. 8 because
“referred” and “for additional activities or funds” are vague and ambiguous. JPMC will interpret
“referred” to mean that Epstein contacted JPMC about Glenn Dubin becoming a JPMC Private
Bank customer. JPMC further objects to Request No. 8 because it is improperly compound and
conjunctive. Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a)(2).
Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing general and specific objections, JPMC
denies knowledge of any purported referral.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 9:
Admit that Epstein received a consulting fee related to JPMorgan’s acquisition of Highbridge
Capital Management in 2004.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 9
In addition to and specifically incorporating its foregoing General Objections and
Objections to Definitions, JPMC objects to Request No. 9 because it does not specify a relevant
time frame. JPMC also objects to Request No. 9 because it seeks information that is not “relevant
to any party’s claim or defense” and therefore not “proportional to the needs of the case.” Fed. R.
Civ. P. 26(b)(1). JPMC further objects to Request No. 9 because it misuses Requests for
Admission as a discovery device. See Pasternak, 2011 WL 4552389, at *5; De Niro, 2022 WL
101909, at *2. JPMC further objects to Request No. 9 because “consulting fee” and “acquisition”
are vague and ambiguous. JPMC will interpret “acquisition” to refer to JPMC’s purchase of a
majority interest in Highbridge Capital Management in 2004.
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 265-71 Filed 08/07/23 Page 3 of 5
Confidential – Subject to Protective Order
10
Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing general and specific objections, JPMC
admits that Dubin & Swieca Holdings, Inc. paid Financial Trust Company, Inc. a fee related to
JPMC’s acquisition of a majority interest in Highbridge Capital Management in 2004.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 10:
Admit that Epstein referred Leslie Wexner, founder and CEO of L Brands, as a client or for
additional activities or funds to JPMorgan’s Private Bank.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 10
In addition to and specifically incorporating its foregoing General Objections and
Objections to Definitions, JPMC objects to Request No. 10 because it does not specify a relevant
time frame. JPMC further objects to Request No. 10 because “referred” and “for additional
activities or funds” are vague and ambiguous. JPMC will interpret “referred” to mean that Epstein
contacted JPMC about Wexner becoming a JPMC Private Bank customer. JPMC further objects
to Request No. 10 because it is improperly compound and conjunctive. Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a)(2).
Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing general and specific objections, JPMC
denies knowledge of any purported referral.
REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 11:
Admit that Epstein referred Leon Black, co-founder and CEO of Apollo Global Management, as
a client or for additional activities or funds to JPMorgan’s Private Bank.
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 11
In addition to and specifically incorporating its foregoing General Objections and
Objections to Definitions, JPMC objects to Request No. 11 because it does not specify a relevant
time frame. JPMC further objects to Request No. 11 because “referred” and “for additional
activities or funds” are vague and ambiguous. JPMC will interpret “referred” to mean that Epstein
contacted JPMC about Black becoming a JPMC Private Bank customer. JPMC further objects to
Request No. 11 because it is improperly compound and conjunctive. Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a)(2).
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 265-71 Filed 08/07/23 Page 4 of 5
Confidential – Subject to Protective Order
107
Dated: May 17, 2023
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ J
ohn J. Butts
Boyd M. Johnson III
Robe
rt L. Boone
Hillary Chutter-Ames
7 World Trade Center
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
(t) (212) 230-8800
(f) (212) 230-8888
boyd.johnson@wilmerhale.com
robert.boone@wilmerhale.com
hillary.chutter-ames@wilmerhale.com
Felicia H. Ellsworth
John J. Butts
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
(t) (617) 526-6687
(f) (617) 526-5000
felicia.ellsworth@wilmerhale.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 265-71 Filed 08/07/23 Page 5 of 5
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 9ba12819-53b1-4617-be54-99b5f4ab8834
- Storage Key
- court-records/usvi-v-jpmorgan/Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 122-cv-10904 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)/265-71.pdf
- Content Hash
- 2db67a76f4b0b0f924f1f23333f24473
- Created
- Feb 12, 2026