DOJ-OGR-00019848.pdf
epstein-archive court document Feb 6, 2026
Case 21-58, Document 39-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page20 of 31
the files around into a different order. She is stuck looking at one page at a time over a screen three feet away without a lawyer in the same room. These are textbook untenable conditions. Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d at 67 (explaining the importance of legal visits and ordering bail during pandemic); Weigand, 2020 WL 5887602, at *2 (ordering bail during pandemic because defendant needed ability to review the discovery in complex, document-heavy case). This is no way to prepare for a trial where the government will be asking for a sentence that will imprison her for the rest of her life. Ex.A
This Court has recognized that, after a relatively short time, pretrial detention turns into prohibited, unconstitutional punishment. United States v. Jackson, 823 F.2d 4, 7 (2d Cir. 1987) (“grave due process concerns” are implicated by a seven-month period of pretrial detention); United States v. Melendez-Carrions, 790 F.2d 984, 1008 (2d Cir. 1986) (Feinberg, J. concurring) (“[G]eneral requirements of due process compel us to draw the line [of permissible pretrial detention] well short of [] eight months.”). Under the current conditions, it can hardly be disputed that Ms. Maxwell is being punished, which in itself
18
DOJ-OGR-00019848
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 942c3f54-3ac3-4d13-ae50-6905a183920a
- Storage Key
- epstein-archive/IMAGES007/DOJ-OGR-00019848.json
- Created
- Feb 6, 2026