EFTA01932485.pdf
dataset_10 PDF 592.1 KB • Feb 4, 2026 • 5 pages
To:
From: Jeffrey Epstein
Sent: Thur 3/27/2014 11:09:37 AM
Subject: Re: additional info
yes many , but never for emails. talk later today,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:25 AM,
wrote:
‹ >
Hi, here's a summary:
1. Initial agreement signed between One Equity Partners (OEP) &
) in 2006. Contract ended in Jan 2014 and was not renewed yet (they sent a new
version which I don't plan to sign). You have a copy but basically it says that they pay us
for every deal we get involved with and invest in Brazil - in addition to the retainer of
1.5M/yr, a 2% fee over any investment w/ a US$1M minimum fee per deal. Current
portfolio's are 5 companies, we sourced all 5 and these are the best performing assets
globally. As an example, Allied, a mobile & tech distributor, went organically from 750M
to 3.2Billion in sales in a 3 year period. We at pacific converted our 2% in equity in this and
other deals and that is held through a usufruct contract w/ OEP's investment vehicle in
each deal. We've always been more than aligned in the deals we sourced as we invested
more than any individual partner, sat in the board and added value locally helping them
grow.
The context for this agreement was that they wanted to do deals in Brazil and I could get
them into any company and also negotiate and get us to win the deals that were good, a
good entry value, then sat in the board and monitored the investments. Despite them
asking me to join OEP as a partner after a few years of agreement, I never did because I
did not want to work for a large bank, had other businesses in Pacific that did not
compete directly (a real estate and a growth investment fund) and, did not want to be
tied up w/ a partner who could change their mind for some unforseen reason, deciding to
leave Brazil. This is exactly what is happening in a way as JPM decided to spin off OEP and
force the sale of the portfolio companies.
2. In january 2012 they sent 2 guys to live in SP and said it was to "help" me and my team
execute as we had too much of a deal flow to handle alone. One of the guys stayed in our
offices for 2 months learning everything we did. As months went by, these 2 guys
(http://www.oneequity.com/Team/location/Sao-Paulo) started taking the deals and
running - going to meetings on their own and not acting as team members, literally by-
passing on deals we sourced. At that time, I renegotiated my deal w/ OEP and Included
the clause that we would participate in everything they did. Rick Smith, whom I dealt with
clearly stated we would be in every deal, sourcing it or not, and the contract reflects that.
Over time, to make sure the guys in NY knew what we were up to, I flew up there every
quarter and presented what we sourced and what deals we were working on, boards and
EFTA_R1_00384722
EFTA01932485
added value, including for their portfolio's that were not based in Brazil but wanted to do
business here. But the reality is that the OEP guys in Brazil were jealous and wanted to
show they could live w/o us, or, needed to justify their presence. Some things made this
worse, for example, when Jamie dimon came to brazil, for the small exclusive reception,
the JPM CEO invited only me and not them ( because they were junior, and because I
helped the bank bring in a dozen of new private banking clients every year as he said), or,
the portfolio companies and partners of One Equity elsewhere, when coming to Brazil,
asked me for help, and not them, as the two could not get them into the owners of the
companies/clients or decision makers that would generate real business. So thats how
things got worse.
3. The fee for the deal in question is Unicoba, an industrial battery-component and led
company. I did not like the deal, but worked on it and it closed in late september of 2013.
Pacific did not co-invest, it was our option not to and we elected that our fee be paid in
cash. Key reason was that they sell to government and I have in my contract that I do not
deal w/ government. When we sent the invoice, they asked us for additional info (what
exactly we did for the deal) which they had never asked for previously. On top, they said
this was due to new JPM requirements. Then, after we sent the info, Rick Smith, senior
guy, said he would speak w/ me personally in his next trip to Brazil, which happened in
early December. In August of last year Rick said OEP would cut all of their outside advisors
and consultants, except for Pacific. In December he said they would no longer renew our
agreement at current terms and that he was told by the Brazil OEP guys that the fee for
the Unicoba deal was not merited because we did not do the work as expected. They
never, ever, sent any email or complained about our work or quality during the process.
On the contrary, we have a ton of praising emails over time and thank you emails to the
team on this deal. But the Brazil guys, in December, cut us off from the MMM (weekly
partners' meeting), took our names out of the investment memo sent to the Investment
Committee, and started selectively cutting us off everything we were working on. In
December they gave us a new version of the agreement that they wanted to sign w/ us
which basically pays a zero fixed fee and only a variable 2% fee. I did not want to renew
anyway, but did not say anything as we wanted to get paid on the deals that were still
active in our pipeline, under the terms of the expiring agreement which had a tail. So I said
"lets solve the open issues and then we work on discussing the new agreement" (which
BTW, cancels off all the rights we have on the expiring contract).
4. After December, I met w/ Rick Smith again in January 2014 in Brazil and had a very
honest conversation about the entire situation. He asked me to send evidence which I did
in February (the ppt you have). But when I met Dick Cashin in feb, he said he was not the
person to discuss this, and threw the decision back to Rick. However, Dick Cashin stated
that we made "too much money" over the years and that this needed to end as things
changed in JPM. In early March 2014 I asked Rick if he had reviewed the evidence, and to
date he said he has not had time. I am supposed to follow up this Friday. Other people
internally aware of this are their internal legal counsel, Judah Shechter, Kathy Bryan, the
CFO (an ex-JPM) and Fritz Hobbs, a close friend to Cashin who is on our side and knows
EFTA_R1_00384723
EFTA01932486
how bad the Brazil OEP'ers behaved.
S. My plan is to (i) drop out of the 3 boards I sit in at the Brazil portfolio companies they/I
invested in; (ii) Get paid the fee for Cless deal (hair products)
that was signed in February 2014 and has a closing next week (they said they would pay),
and (iii) right after get a lawyer to press them to pay for Unicoba. While they offered to
pay 2 more months of retainer (260k) as a "recognition of good work" but in fact to be a
cut of the 1M due, I did not accept as I said we did do work and they need to fulfill the
agreement.
6. OEP's situation is pretty critical - they were for sale until now. I know that the JPM top
exec supervising them - Matt Zames - has been very much on top of their business, costs,
selling, pulling back etc and making their life difficult. So part of what they say is that
"things changed", that they need to figure out what will be of OEP, that these are new
times and paying anything needs to be much justified etc.
A top lawyer very close to me here suggested to connect me w/ litigation attorney
Michael Carlinsky. I just want OEP to pay what they owe me as that is the right thing, and
if getting the lawyer is the most effective way (even if just to put pressure) I will do that. If
going through another path is worthwhile (like asking some big clients to complain or
speaking to someone who can influence), ready to learn what that would be. Its important
to say that we still have equity in two other deals here (so we are their partners), that are
worth at least 10x what they owe us in the unicoba fee. So I don't want to put that at risk,
even though we have contracts there.
They are a firm run by men who do not think very highly of women. No women partners
on the investment side. So they really look at me thinking I will bend and do nothing. I can
be very patient.
thoughts?
Thanks,
EFTA_R1_00384724
EFTA01932487
On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:00 PM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote:
now?
On Wed,a
wrote:
Thanks Boris. Jeff - let me know if I can call you tonight or what other time would be
good to speak. Best,
From: Boris Nikolic [mailto:Boris.Nikolicebgc3.cornj
March 26, 2014 04:29 PM
• Jeffrey Epstein <teevacationftarnail.com>
and Jeffery
Jeffery as I mentioned you has some challenges re her. Agreement. You are uniquely
position to advise her. It is the best if you could connect directly.
Jeffery's cell is
He is now in NYC. Please call him when you can.
Thank you Jeffrey!
Boris
Sent from my Windows Phone
EFTA_R1_00384725
EFTA01932488
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to ice\ acanon@gmad.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
*************************** ****** **************************
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmad com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_00384726
EFTA01932489
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 8864e4ee-4b88-4871-a3ea-d9e7323e7469
- Storage Key
- dataset_10/6c21/EFTA01932485.pdf
- Content Hash
- 6c21571f4d137ff90b48fb1da3db9b53
- Created
- Feb 4, 2026