DOJ-OGR-00018267.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Header** * Case Number: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE * Document Number: 749 * Filed Date: 08/10/22 * Page Number: 166 of 236 **Transcript Text** 1. reason most of that can't be a public document. And what you need to do, since narrow tailoring is required, is to make a public version so you redact it to exclude the reading of the warrant. I don't see why a public version can't be made that simply redacts the few instances in which individuals whose privacy must be protected is redacted. 2. MS. COMEY: That's fine, your Honor. We'll work on that. 3. THE COURT: Okay. 4. MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge. 5. THE COURT: Ms. Sternheim, I'm happy to hear if there's additional -- I had that note to raise here for purposes of the video. 6. Do you have that for other exhibits? 7. MS. STERNHEIM: The individual exhibits are not as glaring to me as the video was, and viewing it in the context of the public not being aware of it, it sends an impression that this was like a domicile of debauchery, and there were a few pictures that maybe should not have been in the public domain, but 39 minutes of it should have been. 8. THE COURT: I completely agree. 9. MS. COMEY: That's understood, your Honor. We approached it this way to avoid having to pause and then turn to the side and then go back, but completely understood. And we will prepare a redacted version that can be released to the public. **Footer** * Southern District Reporters, P.C. * Phone Number: (212) 805-0300 * Document ID: DOJ-OGR-00018267