DOJ-OGR-00002830.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Text Extraction** The image displays a page from a legal document, likely a court transcript or brief. The text is presented in black font on a white background. **Header Information** * A blue hyperlink at the top reads: "Case:2:20-cv-003054PABACD Document 18 Filed 08/03/2021 Page 9 of 20" * Below the hyperlink, the text states: "circuit have defined the relevant jury pool with reference to 'the systematic defect identified by the defendant.' Rioux, F. Supp. at 1565-66; see Allen, 2021 WL 431458, *5 (defining jury pool as both 'the White Plains master wheel and the White Plains qualified wheel' because the defendants' allegations impacted both venires). Under that approach, the jury venire that bears the brunt of the defendant's allegations of systematic exclusion is determined to be the relevant jury pool. See Allen, 2021 WL 431458, *5; Rioux, F. Supp. at 1565-66. Here, Schulte's allegations of systematic exclusion center almost entirely on the juror selection procedures for the White Plains master wheel.4 See infra 15-17. Accordingly, the appropriate venire is the White Plains master wheel." **Main Content** The main content of the document is divided into sections with headings and subheadings. The first section is titled "Relevant Community" and discusses the relevant community in relation to the case. The second section is titled "White Plains master wheel" and provides additional information about the White Plains master wheel. **Footer Information** At the bottom of the page, the text states: "For example, if Schulte had alleged that the juror questionnaire form displayed systematic exclusion, see supra 4 n. 1, then the qualified wheel would be the appropriate jury venire for comparison. Because he does not do that, the master wheel must be the relevant venire." **Page Number** The page number "9" is displayed at the bottom center of the page. **Document Identification** In the bottom-right corner, the text reads: "DOJ-OGR-00002830".