EFTA01900658.pdf
dataset_10 PDF 367.8 KB • Feb 4, 2026 • 3 pages
To: Jeffrey Epsteinfieeyacation©gmail.corn]
From: President
Sent: Mon 3/25/2013 1:59:41 PM
Subject: Re: Thanks
The Cage concert is both a good and bad example. Check in contrast the impact of
the parallel programs in the previous years on Henry Cowell and Walter Piston.
It would not have worked as you suggest--a lecture demo, and would have cost the
same. The three pieces by Cage--two of which were premieres in the US--had to be
seen and heard; they are performance arts. You are also wrong about audiences.
Many concert goers do not like lectures and never go; some can't and won't make
it. And we did the Cage because Bard is the home of the Cage Archive, a gift of
Merce Cunningham. Otherwise I would have skipped the idea.
I have the sense of fighting my worst enemies in a a shadow way, not openly, and
I surely have them. I am not struggling--I am struggling for the primary source
of survival in music history for large ensembles--patronage. And you once asked a
question of me. The answer is that I wish to work on the podium, to perform and
the continue to fight--if one odes not work one dies inside--and I am sure many
many in the profession would validate the need and the accomplishment. Ask
Emmanuel Ax, for example of the members of the Emerson Quartet.
Shrugging off arguments in my line of work is only possible when you have an
endowment or like Stokowski, Munch , Leinsdorf and Koussevitzky, you married
money.
Leon
Original Message
From: "Jeffrey Epstein" <jeevacationegmail.com>
To: "President" <
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 5:52:37 AM
Subject: Re: Thanks
academically correct, auction metaphor related to ultimate value, new fossil
record changes history, explains and possibly connects, destroys closely held
beliefs. I have searched for the impact of the cage performances. it was not
undiscovered , it had miniscule impact, and would have been as effective as a
lecture with a small demo. ./ II want you to win, it would be easy to just shrug
your argumnets off. There is a reason you are still struggling and it is not your
talent. . the people that come an hour early to listen , are your audience, the
others are inside to get warm.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:45 AM, President < > wrote:
I agree that something not acknowledged as a treasure needs to be evaluated. But
the auction house metaphor does not quite work--for reasons of actual as well as
perceived value, speculation, collection madness, exclusive ownership. What is
relevant is the re-emergence of music in new contexts, so that the evaluation
reveals itself in part in influence (e.g. forms of neo-classicism). Also I am
interested in the evolution of musical meaning, and treasures are not the only
purpose of the endeavor. Remember your own enjoyment at listening to
Herzogenberg.
Leon
Original Message
From: "Jeffrey Epstein" < 'eevacation@gmail.com >
To: "President" <
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 9:33:03 PM
Subject: Re: Thanks
EFTA_R1_00329653
EFTA01900658
when treasures are "re discovered" . ( not sure the re is appropriate ). it needs
to be evaluated ( here you can use "re" ). it requires close examination to
ascertain its new value. the auction house , is a nice way of determing it. and a
long way on its path to recognition.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:45 AM, President < > wrote:
I am finally home.
First, let me wish you a happy passover; second, thanks for the candor and the
friendship. So you won't mind if I push back.
There are, as I can see it, three issues and if each can be addressed, with a
third round of checking, you might think differently. I have had Lynne send on
names.
1) The repertoire. The works we do are worth doing, sometimes because a
masterpiece is unearthed, and sometimes, something good but influential and worth
hearing has been revived, and and sometimes as a foil from history against which
we measure our so called greatest hits. In all cases, the works have to be
performed and experienced and therefore performed. And we have a loyal following
in the hall and on the internet. So something is working.
2) The format of the concerts is a curated one that links music with literature,
politics, history--a necessary part of what music is. In that sense the ASO is
totally unique.
3) Botstein and the ASO. The truth is that I have been such a thorn of the side
of critics, conductors and managers that I am not surprised at what you found.
But you will find support and real support within the profession. Pardon the
expression but I have not gotten medals and awards for anything but my work in
music. I just got the Bruckner Medal this month (the other recipients have been
Toscanini and Walter, among others). And I got the same Austrian Cross for
contributions to music as Sir Simon Rattle--the same year. I hate that stuff, but
there it is.
On 1--again think of Nabokov, whose favorite Russian poets were often obscure
figures derided by all the other critics. He stood alone. The Marschner is
beautiful opera and a crucial link between Beethoven and Wagner. So I stand in
the Quixotic defense of works that are worth it--even if they are not as good as
others. Music does not follow Darwinian patterns (a longer discussion). It is not
science. That is, if i may say so, a commonplace; the idea that history is a
judge that seems right but is not. One of the greatest plays was forgotten after
the writer died and rediscovered in the 1920s, 100 years later--Woyzeck. That is
just one example.
As to 2, that is one way to build an audience, by linking music to other forms of
life--to pretentiously paraphrase Wittgenstein.
And to No 3) I am still haunted by early criticisms by angry competitors and
idiot ignorant critics who hated my ideas and the fact that I was an outsider
with another career in scholarship and education.
That being said, why not give me one last shot at proving the majority wrong. I
have been at it for nearly 25 years, and in the next five, if there can be no
measured improvement on the execution front--then that will be that. But 120,000
sales and a Grammy nomination for a rare work--a Popov symphony from the 1930s,--
and more than 20 years of some real success (we have generated a body of new
EFTA_R1_00329654
EFTA01900659
scholarship in music history--is cause enough to inspire you to give us help.
This is my plea. But I am not Moses, and if there were a God, he would not be on
my side. (Another reason to help).
I greatly cherish this new friendship and I have real admiration for how you go
about doing things----tough as it is often I truly enjoy the argument. But this
time I and not your preliminary findings and researchers--am right. Given the
firestorm I created 20 years ago I am even surprised I did as well in your
research, whatever grade you put on the result. It is not the final exam, only a
badly constructed mid-term, I am a bit proud not to have gotten a top grade. True
controversy rarely leads to praise in this business. Nabokov became famous and
admired only at the end.
Leon
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com , and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com , and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA_R1_00329655
EFTA01900660
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 5f6535fe-22a5-409e-8a79-cbccba23208c
- Storage Key
- dataset_10/31f2/EFTA01900658.pdf
- Content Hash
- 31f21eff3f27c8352149248b6bf2de9d
- Created
- Feb 4, 2026