DOJ-OGR-00017084.pdf

--- Page 1 --- The image presents a document with a clear header and footer, featuring the following information: **Header:** * Case number: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE * Document number: 767 * Filed date: 08/10/22 * Page number: 63 of 257 **Footer:** * Southern District Reporters, P.C. contact information: + Phone number: (212) 805-0300 + DOJ-OGR-00017084 **Document Content:** The document appears to be a transcript of a court proceeding, with the following text: LCKCmax3 for abuse after she had already visited Epstein in New York, how the defendant asked Carolyn to travel, too. This went on for years. Count Five is the sex trafficking conspiracy count which spans from 2000 to 2004, and this count relates to Carolyn and Virginia. You heard about the steps the defendant took in those years with Carolyn and Virginia. She was taking steps to traffic girls for sex, recruiting Virginia Roberts at Mar-a-Lago, transporting Virginia to other states with Epstein, sending Carolyn up to the Palm Beach massage room on her first visit, calling Carolyn for massage appointments in Florida so that she could engage in commercial sex acts. The defendant took so many steps in furtherance of the conspiracies charged in the indictment, the evidence about that was overwhelming, it went on for years. But let me say this, because it's very important. For each of the conspiracy counts, to find the defendant guilty, you only have to find that she did it once, that there existed one moment in time in all of those years where she agreed to do this, and that Maxwell or Epstein took some step to carry out the agreement. That's it. If you find that one moment happened, the defendant is guilty. Let me say one last thing about the law. For each of the counts, I expect Judge Nathan will instruct you about something called venue. We're required to prove that it's more The document is presented in a clear and legible format, with the text arranged in a standard font. The use of headings, subheadings, and bullet points helps to organize the content and make it easier to follow. Overall, the document appears to be a well-structured and informative transcript of a court proceeding.