Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 122-cv-10904 (S.D.N.Y. 2022)/238-49.pdf

EXHIBIT 74 Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 238-49 Filed 07/25/23 Page 1 of 5 Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 238-49 Filed 07/25/23 Page 2 of 5 From: To: CC: Sent: Subject: Attachments: Hi Paul- Bonnie K Perry <bonnie.k .perry@jpmorgan .com> Paul V Morris <paul.v.morris@jpmorgan .com> Mary C Casey <mary .c.casey@jpmorgan .com>;James Dalessio <James.Dalessio@jpmorgan .com> 6/9/2010 10 :16:07 PM Jeffrey Epstein Epstein Article - dtd. 6-9-2010.pdf; Epstein Article dtd. 5-27 -2010 .pdf , -·- · -·-·-·-·-·-·-·- ·-· -·-·- ·-· -·-·- ·-· -·-· -·-·-·- ·- ·-·-· -·-·-·-·- ·-· -·- ·-·-· -·-·-·-·-·-·- ·- ·-·-· -· -·-·-·- ·-· -, ..'. have _ regressed_the_ DDR __ back to you .for _additional _ informati _on . . L. .... ...... .. _____ _ ___ _ Redacted _ - _Privileg _ ed _·-· ··· ·-·-·-· -·-·- ·- _.·_ J i Redacted - Privileged i · ·-·-·-· -· -·-·- ·-·- ·-· -·- ·-· -· -·- ·-· -·-·-·-·-·-·-·- · -·- ·-· -·-·- ·-·-· -·-·- · -·- · -·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·- · -·- · -·- · -·- ·-·- ·-·- · -·- ·- ·-· -·- ·-· -·-·-·- ·- ·- ·-·- ·-·-· -·-·- ·-· -·-· -' DDR Name: Jeffrey Epstein ,,, DDR Link -> Notes://PPUSMC017/85256F64005749BC/6BCDEBE8A049C44485256E6F0063C802 /SEE4238F2F8C2E1485256D2400745A6D Please update the Transaction Profile/Expected account activity - specifically, please note monthly cash withdrawal activity, ranging $30k to $50k and the purpose of these cash withdrawals . Please update the summary to include the client's current personal circumstances , business activities, etc. I have attached a couple of articles to assist. Further, please update the "Financial Trust Company Inc ." DOR - last update 2003 . This entity holds the bulk of the wealth held for Mr. Epstein within the relationship. DDR Name: Financial Trust Company, Inc.,,, DDR link -> Notes ://PPUSMC017 /85256F64005749BC/58A38C458E8182CD8525727C0067562D /26A36B1774A08A5485256D240076F422 Since this is a BVI entity , please ensure that you obtain evidence of tax declaration (e .g ., a statement from the lawyer I accountant and 5 yrs of tax statements). 3 entities within the relationship do not currently have DD Rs . Please create DDRs for the following entities : 116 East 65th St LLC NES, LLC Zorro Trust If you have any questions, please feel free to contact either me or Jim Dalessio . Thanks, Bonnie Bonnie K Perry, VP, CAMS I Pri Ya te Bauk Risk l\Igmt & Co ntrol 7 12 ;\ fain , 4th Fl , Hou sto n , TX 7700 2 (Di: 2-N 04S ) Te l: 7 13 .2 16 -.513 6 Fax: '7 13 .216 -79 70 Confidential EXHIBIT 3C WIT: ~~ DATE: =~ C. Campbell , ROR CRR CSR # 13921 JPM -SDNYLIT-00008237 Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 238-49 Filed 07/25/23 Page 3 of 5 Local ATTORNEYS SETTLE FEE DISPUTE WITH BILLIONAIRE LAW FIRM HAD SOUGHT MONEY FOR LEGAL BILLS FROM SEX OFFENDER By Jane Musgrave The Palm Beach Post 314words 9 June 2010 South Florida Sun-Sentinel FLSS Palm Beach 3B English Copyright 2010, South Florida Sun-Sentinel. All Rights Reserved. A $2 million dispute between billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and attorneys who represented 15 women who claimed the Palm Beach resident sexually abused them is apparently over. In court papers filed late Monday, attorneys representing Miami law firm Podhurst Orseck said a settlement had been reached with Epstein. Terms of the agreement weren't spelled out. Podhurst Orseck filed suit against Epstein last month, claiming his refusal to pay its legal bill constituted a violation of an agreement the money manager signed to escape federal charges. As part of the 2007 plea deal, Epstein agreed to pay attorneys to negotiate settlements on behalf of the 33 women who told federal prosecutors he had paid them for sexually charged massages at his Palm Beach mansion when some were as young as 14. Twelve of the women sought the help of Podhurst partner Robert Josefsberg, who was appointed to negotiate settlements. He also represented three women in civil lawsuits that were also settled for undisclosed amounts. About a dozen other women hired other attorneys to represent them. Most of those lawsuits are still pending. Epstein, 57, argued that Podhurst inflated its costs. He said he had already paid the firm roughly $500,000 and didn't believe he owed another $2 million. He offered to put $2 million in a court registry until the dispute was resolved. Epstein pleaded guilty to two sex-related charges and was released from the Palm Beach County jail in July after serving 13 months of an 18-month jail sentence. In return, federal prosecutors agreed not to pursue him for crimes that could have sent him to prison for decades. Billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein had argued law finn inflated its costs. Photo(s) DocumentFLSS000020100609e6690003z Page 1 of 1 2010 Factiva, Inc. All rights reserved. Confidential JPM-SDNYLIT-00008238 Case 1:22-cv-10904-JSR Document 238-49 Filed 07/25/23 Page 4 of 5 A SECTION JUDGE ORDERS N.Y. PAPER\ TO GIVE UP EPSTEIN TAPE By MICHELE DARGAN Daily News Staff Writer 529 words 27 May 2010 Palm Beach Daily News PBDN DN1 1A English Copyright 2010 The Palm Beach Daily News. All Rights Reserved. Palm Beach Post File Photo by Uma Sanghvi\ Jeffrey Epstein, shown in this 2008 file photo, spoke to 'New York Daily\ News' reporter George Rush on tape. Since Epstein has asserted his Fifth\ Amendment privilege in depositions, the taped conversation is the only way\ the jury can hear Epstein in his own words, attorneys for client Jane Doe\ say. The New York Daily News must turn over a tape-recorded interview between reporter George Rush and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein because the information cannot be obtained anywhere else and outweighs reporter's privilege, a federal judge has ruled. Attorneys Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell have been fighting to obtain the tape in representing their client Jane Doe, a minor at the time of Epstein's abuse. Since Epstein has asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege in depositions, the taped conversation is the only way the jury can hear Epstein in his own words, the attorneys say. After listening to the 22-minute recording and reading the transcript, Manhattan U.S. District Judge Lawrence McKenna agreed in his six-page ruling. Of particular relevance, McKenna noted "a statement included in the first full paragraph attributed to Mr. Epstein at page 15 of the transcript ... the court finds that the materials at issue 'are not reasonably obtainable from other available source' ... since the record is quite clear that Mr. Epstein has regularly been asserting, and will continue to assert, his Fifth Amendment privilege to relevant questions. The fact that the recording is in Mr. Epstein's own voice is also significant from a trial perspective." Portions of the recording can be used related to liability and damages, the ruling says. But whether the attorneys will have the tape in time for the start of their July 17 trial is still in question. The judge's order says the recording and transcript will be held in chambers or under seal until any appeal is decided or the time to file a notice of appeal has expired. 'We're happy that the court agreed with our argument that this important evidence supporting Jane Doe's case can be presented to the jury," Cassell said by phone Tuesday. Laura Handman, attorney for the New York Daily News, said they are appealing the decision. Epstein, 57, pleaded guilty last year to soliciting a minor for pros