DOJ-OGR-00019412.pdf

Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page13 of 58 unsealing process. Doc. 17, p 6. But because of the criminal protective order issued by Judge Nathan, all Ms. Maxwell could reveal to Judge Preska was that she was aware of critical new information. Doc. 17, p 6. She couldn’t tell Judge Preska what that information was. Doc. 17, p 6. Judge Preska declined to stay the unsealing process but said she would reevaluate if Judge Nathan modified the criminal protective order and allowed Ms. Maxwell to share with Judge Preska, under seal, all she had learned as described above. Doc. 17, p 6. The order declining to modify the criminal protective order. At Judge Preska’s suggestion, Ms. Maxwell filed a motion with Judge Nathan seeking modification of the criminal protective order. App. 124-31. All the motion asked was for permission to share with Judge Preska and with this Court, under seal, what Ms. Maxwell had learned [REDACTED] 8 DOJ-OGR-00019412