EFTA01797840.pdf

From: Dr. Henry Jarecki Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 5:02 PM To: 'Jeffrey Epstein' Subject: RE: I never said I could, after you had ma=e up your mind, "tell you the truth." I had and have no kno=ledge of the truth (and I'm not saying that in some high philosophical sense). nick sent me projections, at least ten within twenty days and all based on different scenarios of where it would be shot and how many days after he played shrinko with the script, and dependi=g on who took what payments and in what waterfall order they were to be repaid and all of his projections made money though most inevitably we=e uncertain as they depended on events that were then futural like shooting i= gramercy park or the arts club and getting Pacino or the casting director to accept a lower fee or cutting the days to 28 or shooting in Louisiana or getting hig= Louisiana rebates, etc. There couldn't have been a truth and there couldn=#82173 even have been an estimate of it, nor can there be now. </=pan> I may have said "discuss it with=you" or maybe I said it jocularly. There is no truth in predictions of the=future. I was interested to get your perceptions as nick had told me that you had a=ked specialists in the field to advise you. I had no such experts and I n=ver would have presumed to know what would become of it. I still don't. <=:p> Nor did I have "intimate knowledge. Nick spent fourteen hours a day on it taking to projection=creators, possible finance sources, and intended acting or production participants, &=bsp;and I got a ten to twenty minute glimpse of a status once a day while he was in=New York and less yet while he was in la. I advised on how to deal with b=rg and other blackmailers, not on the finance. =/p> Add to all this that I was never asked=to opine on it. As it had started all around me, and I was puzzled as to=how you had come to an interest and nick told me that it was at your instance, = had no reason to intrude myself in rendering an unasked opinion. Had I be=n asked to do so I would surely have said what I do herein, namely, that I am=not in the field, have no experience in the vicissitudes of film equity investm=nts, and would if I were to put money into it myself not be doing so in prospect=of profit but rather in ambivalent solidarity with my son (ambivalent because = know how inconstant a source of satisfaction the business is).=/font> Add to this that I have no aspirations=or pretensions that I know public taste. What I like, the public doesn't, typically and vice versa. I had looked forward to your views as you or your=advisors would have had a sense of whether it would appeal to people after the Wall Street- and madoff-bashing time. and I saw Pacino do a reading of it in whi=h he seemed involved and I knew Pacino liked nick: I saw them together =n two occasions and saw the email exchanges between them which underlined it and =aw the non-money (though always complaining that he hadn't yet had a firm pay =r play commitment by nick's financier ohoven) exchanges with berg.=/o:p> EFTA_R1_00135267 EFTA01797840 It is just such troubles that lead me =ci my view that one must define all business relationships very precisely befo=e doing anything. Your conclusion is different: do nothing with friends=or maybe just with me (though I find it hard to believe I'm the only person with who= you've had such experiences of possible betrayal). My theory permits me to l=ave it all open; yours enables you to go the more convenient (equally satisfyin=?) road: new friends. I like my theory better: most people confuse their perceptions with the truth when in fact there is none. (Which by the =ay, is why I don't take umbrage at your view as I otherwise would have to). From: Jeffrey =pstein Imailto:jeevacation@gmail.comj Sent: Saturday, December 11,=2010 12:13 AM To: Dr. Henry Jarecki Subject: =/o:p> henry„ it is silly to deny what happened. Your statement to me that " good,As long as you decided on your own , not to invest, I can now, =ell you the truth". I also think it is guaranteed to lose money..On the island you had maintainted that you weren't really up on the numbers,told me that you thought that it was probabaly viable, and had little knowledge of the details.( seperate from the foreign sale numbers ) After , and only after ,i told youof my decision , you told me that of course you had intimate knowledge and had been involved all the way along. I can understand you not wanting to be accused by Nick of disparaging his deal. however, you could have easily said , you found yourself in a conflict position so that you would prefer not to opine.However , I o=ly spent the time on it as your friend nothing more, . I need not remind you t=at i am neither bound to you by blood or money. but soley by choice. &nbs=; I would ask you to decide if there is a chance that you are not owning up to =hat happened, I am disappointed , The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeev=cation@gmail.com <mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com> , and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. The information contained in this message, and any attachment, is intended =nly for the intended recipient(s). It may contain confidential, privileged or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to review, copy or distribute this message. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete this message. Thank you. 2 EFTA_R1_00135268 EFTA01797841