EFTA00651471.pdf

From: Tyler Shears > To: Cc: jeffrey epstein <jeevacation®gmail.com> Subject: Re: website push Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:40:06 +0000 Hi Nice speaking with you earlier. Please make sure you check the Bing and Yahoo results as well. I will send a report for those over on Friday. They are looking very clean from my end though and hopefully the same is visible on your end. The Google results have been tough with the Google+ signals supporting the two negative placements, but we are working on a different strategy now to help devalue those placements while enhancing the value of our Forbes post and other sites. I'll be adding more directory links to the existing sites you mentioned and will also be focusing on them in our next round of press releases. I'll also look at a few potential homes for the tumor article that may be more suitable than Huffington and provide a strong Google+ author to distribute through. I have confidence we can return some of our properties to the first page in the next 2-3 weeks and will focus heavily on that now. I called a bit ago to keep our conversation going but got your VM - please let me know a good time for you to chat. Respectfully, Tyler Shears On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:23 PM, wrote: Hi Tyler, thanks for talking w/ me just now. Thanks for embedding the forbes and the science site or the .org site in the article. could we use the tumor growth for a feature article too somewhere?? for Huffington? Since the other positive Huffington is stable on the 1st page. I agree that a major push of the well performing sites should be the focus over the next two weeks. I am updating them today with new content. They have naturally performed well under Google for the last year, they are updated regularly so they should get back to the 1st page fairly quickly. I will also look at the directory list you gave me to see if I can do something there. EFTA00651471 To recap, the sites that did well are: --org --VI Foundation --usvi --science cell: EFTA00651472