291-18.pdf

EXHIBIT 19 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-18 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 1 of 14 7115 Rue Notre Dame, Miami Beach, FL 33141 Kress Court Reporting, Inc. 305-866-7688 Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2 3 JANE DOE NO. 2, Case No: 08-CV-80119 4 Plaintiff, 5Vs 6 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 7 Defendant. ___________________/ 8 JANE DOE NO. 3, Case NO: 08-CV-80232 9 Plaintiff, 10 Vs 11 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 12 Defendant. ___________________/ 13 JANE DOE NO. 4, Case No: 08-CV-80380 14 Plaintiff, 15 Vs. 16 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 17 Defendant. 18 ___________________/ 19 JANE DOE NO. 5, Case No: 08-CV-80381 20 Plaintiff, 21 Vs 22 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 23 Defendant. ___________________/ 24 25 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-18 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 2 of 14 7115 Rue Notre Dame, Miami Beach, FL 33141 Kress Court Reporting, Inc. 305-866-7688 2 (Pages 2 to 5) Page 2 1 JANE DOE NO. 6, Case No: 08-CV-80994 2 Plaintiff, 3Vs 4 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 5 Defendant. ___________________/ 6 JANE DOE NO. 7, Case No. 08-CV-80993 7 Plaintiff, 8 Vs 9 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 10 Defendant. 11 ___________________/ 12 C.M.A., Case No: 08-CV-80811 13 Plaintiff, 14 Vs 15 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 16 Defendant. ___________________/ 17 JANE DOE, Case No: 08-CV-80893 18 Plaintiff, 19 Vs 20 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 21 Defendant. 22 ___________________/ 23 24 25 Page 3 1 JANE DOE NO. II, Case No: 08-CV-80469 2 Plaintiff, 3Vs 4 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 5 Defendant. ___________________/ 6 JANE DOE NO. 101, Case No: 09-CV-80591 7 Plaintiff, 8 Vs 9 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 10 Defendant. 11 ___________________/ 12 JANE DOE NO. 102, Case No: 09-CV-80656 13 Plaintiff, 14 Vs 15 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 16 Defendant. ___________________/ 17 18 19 20 1031 Ives Dairy Road Suite 228 21 North Miami, Florida July 29, 2009 22 11:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. 23 24 25 Page 4 1 V I D E O T A P E D 2 D E P O S I T I O N 3 of 4 ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ 5 6 taken on behalf of the Plaintiffs pursuant 7 to a Re-Notice of Taking Deposition (Duces Tecum) 8 9 - - - 10 APPEARANCES: 11 MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. 12 BY: STUART MERMELSTEIN, ESQ. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard 13 Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 14 Attorney for Jane Doe 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. 15 16 ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER BY: BRAD J. EDWARDS, ESQ., and 17 CARA HOLMES, ESQ. Las Olas City Centre 18 Suite 1650 401 East Las Olas Boulevard 19 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Attorney for Jane Doe and E.W. 20 And L.M. 21 PODHURST ORSECK 22 BY: KATHERINE W. EZELL 25 West Flagler Street 23 Suite 800 Miami, Florida 33130 24 Attorney for Jane Doe 101 and 102. 25 Page 5 1 APPEARANCES: 2 3 LEOPOLD-KUVIN ADAM J. LANGINO, ESQ. 4 2925 PGA Boulevard Suite 200 5 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 Attorney for B.B. 6 7 RICHARD WILLITS, ESQ. 2290 10th Avenue North 8 Suite 404 Lake Worth, Florida 33461 9 Attorney for C.M.A. 10 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & 11 COLEMAN, LLP BY: ROBERT CRITTON, ESQ. 12 515 North Flagler Drive Suite 400 13 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Attorney for Jeffrey Epstein. 14 15 16 ALSO PRESENT: 17 JOE LANGSAM, VIDEOGRAPHER 18 19 - - - 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-18 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 3 of 14 7115 Rue Notre Dame, Miami Beach, FL 33141 Kress Court Reporting, Inc. 305-866-7688 3 (Pages 6 to 9) Page 6 1 INDEX OF EXAMINATION 2 WITNESS DIRECT CROSS 3 ALFREDO RODRIGUEZ 4 (By Mr. Mermelstein) 12 5 (By Mr. Edwards) 157 6 (By Mr. Langino) 260 7 8 9 10 INDEX OF EXHIBITS 11 EXHIBITS PAGE 12 1 Message pad 72 13 2 Documents 115 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 7 1 Deposition taken before MICHELLE PAYNE, Court 2 Reporter and Notary Public in and for the State of 3 Florida at Large, in the above cause. 4 - - - 5 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is the case of 6 Jane Doe No. 2, plaintiff, versus Jeffrey 7 Epstein, defendant. Jane Doe No. 3, 8 plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, 9 defendant. Jane Doe No. 4, plaintiff, 10 versus Jeffrey Epstein, defendant. And Jane 11 Doe No. 5, plaintiff, versus Jeffrey 12 Epstein, defendant. Jane Doe No. 6, 13 plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, 14 defendant. Jane Doe No. 7, plaintiff, 15 versus Jeffrey Epstein, defendant. CMA, 16 plaintiff, versus Jeffrey Epstein, 17 defendant. And Jane Doe, plaintiff, versus 18 Jeffrey Epstein, et al, defendant. And Jane 19 Doe -- is there a shorter thing that we can 20 do here? It's also missing this one right 21 here. 22 MR. MERMELSTEIN: Do we have a problem 23 with saying Jane Doe 2 and the Epstein and 24 related cases? 25 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: I'm missing this Jane Page 8 1 Doe right here on the copy you gave me. I'm 2 missing which Jane Doe this is. 3 They're all different case numbers. Do 4 you want me to go through each case number? 5 MR. CRITTON: I'm going to note my 6 objection. Obviously if this deposition 7 gets played -- not obviously, I'm going to 8 object to the litany of each one so I don't 9 know how we can separate it out. Maybe if 10 and when at the time of trial and depending 11 on how the Court determines what comes in 12 and what doesn't with regard to the 13 consolidated aspects of this. I have no 14 great idea other than just saying Jane Doe 15 versus Epstein, et al, or something like 16 that, or Jane Doe, et al. 17 MS. EZELL: Couldn't we just say and 18 those cases which have been consolidated 19 with it for Discovery purposes? 20 MR. EDWARDS: Although there is cases 21 here that have cross noticed this from state 22 court that haven't been consolidated so that 23 may not work. You may have to read them 24 all, if it works out your way that will just 25 get edited out, at least he will have read Page 9 1 that caption, every caption. Right? Is 2 there a better suggestion? 3 MR. CRITTON: No. There may be a better 4 suggestion if he starts this is such and 5 such day, it's the deposition of Mr. 6 Rodriguez in the case such and such, and we 7 can almost fill it in depending on which 8 tape it goes, how it fills in, at least 9 we'll have the context of