DOJ-OGR-00021560.pdf

Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page130 of 217 SA-384 15 M6SQmax1 1 Virginia, was unaware if she had interacted with anyone under 2 the age of 18 at Epstein's properties. She never gave Annie 3 Farmer a massage. She was unaware whether Epstein possessed 4 sex toys. She was unaware that he was engaging in sexual 5 activity with anyone other than her in the 1990s and 2000s. 6 She never gave Epstein a massage. The credible testimony and 7 evidence admitted at trial disproves these assertions which 8 were made under oath. 9 Paragraph 79, the defendant objects to the 10 characterization of the offense conduct as contrary to the 11 trial record. Here, defense hasn't provided any reason 12 specifying this, and I don't see one. So based on the written 13 objection, it's overruled. 14 Paragraph 81, the defendant objects to the assertion 15 that Ms. Maxwell had direct responsibility for any sexualized 16 massages that several women or any other people that Carolyn 17 may have brought to Epstein's residence may have performed, and 18 she contends there's no record that she interfaced with these 19 individuals. I am prepared to overrule that objection. 20 The paragraph makes clear that these individuals did 21 not interact directly with Ms. Maxwell. Nevertheless, for the 22 reasons explained a little while ago in overruling the 23 objections to paragraphs 27 and 28, I do conclude that the 24 evidence at trial established that the defendant's recruitment 25 of Virginia set the recruitment scheme in motion that resulted SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C... (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00021560