040.pdf

Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 09-CIV- 80469- MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE II, Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I ------------- NOTICE OF RELIANCE ON AND INCORPORATION OF DEFENDANT'S REPLY {DE 31} TO PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS{DE 20 & 36) Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby gives notice of his intent to rely on and incorporate hereon Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss: I. Defendant, EPSTEIN, filed his Motion to Dismiss on May 9, 2009 (DE 13). 2. Plaintiff, Jane Doe II, filed her initial Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss on May 22, 2009 (DE 20). 3. Defendant, EPSTEIN, filed his Reply to Plaintiff, Jane Doe II's, Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss on June 1, 2009 (DE 31 ). 4. After a hearing on June 12, 2009, counsel for Plaintiff, Jane Doe II, stated he would withdraw certain claims in Plaintiff, Jane Doe II' s initial Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss (DE 20). Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 2 of 3 Jane Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Page 2 5. Therefore, Plaintiff, Jane Doe II, filed her Amended Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss on June 12, 2009 (DE 36). 6. Based upon the forgoing, Defendant relies on his Reply to Plaintiff, Jane Doe II's, Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss (DE 31) and incorporates same herein by reference as if same was filed in Reply to Plaintiff, Jane Doe II's, Amended Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss (DE 36). Accordingly, Defendant, EPSTEIN, sta11ds on those arguments set forth in DE 31 and, therefore, will not be filing an additional supplemental reply. RITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar o. 224162 rcrit@bclcl w.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike@bclclaw.com Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 3 of 3 Jane Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Page 3 Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served thi19iay on all counsel of record identified on the following service list in the manner ~--ified~ansmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this {f day of e , 2009: Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net Counsel for Plaintiff Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 561-835-8691 Fax iagesg@bellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein By: ----t-"-"=:.._ __ _ ROBERT D. RITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar o. 224162 rcrit@bcl aw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike@bclclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-842-2820 Fax: 561-515-3148 (Co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)