EFTA00031889.pdf

From: (USANYS)" To: )" Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 15:20:21 +0000 I defer to you, but are you sure we don't want rolling productions so we can at least start getting stuff in house? From: Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 11:02 AM To: (NY) (FBI) <>; (USANYS) [Contractor] < Cc: (USANYS)<> (NY) (FBI) <->; efl <IMS (USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents (NY) (FBI) Following up on this, I understand from that she was able to provide you with a 12 TB drive last week— could you please let us know when we will be able to get the materials? I expect a judge will ask us about discovery as early as this week. Also, the related critical question that I don't think we have clarity on is whether you're giving us a copy of everything that was collected (including reproducing the materials that you previously gave us, but which are not searchable), or have you and figured out a way to categorize the prior productions so they're useful for us? We would strongly prefer to just get everything at once in a usable format, but please let us know if you expect to produce materials differently than that. thanks, From: (NY) (FBI) <> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 13:14 To: (USANYS) [Contractor] 4 Cc: (USANYS) clb; c>; Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents (USANYS).c> (NY) (FBI) < (NY) (FBI) We are going every other day now, ramping up to 75% week after next. I need drives to put things on like and I discussed earlier. Once I have those drives, it will take me a couple days to copy stuff. LMK when I can expect the drives. Thanks. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun 19, 2020 1:09 PM, " "< wrote: EFTA00031889 following up on the below — please let us know? Given case developments in recent days, this has become urgent. Thanks. From: Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 14:28 To: . (NY) (FBI) < >; (USANYS) [Contractor] < Cc: (NY) (FBI) ) > (NY) (FBI) < >; (USANYS) (USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents < Wanted to circle back on this and check in, particularly because we desperately need to get the results from the July and September searches before moving forward with possible additional charges in the case. I know you had mentioned you needed to push back your prior estimate of complete production by early June, by a couple weeks, so wanted to see what the current estimate is? I don't think we've started to get anything yet but please correct me if I'm wrong. thanks, From: (NY) (FBI) <> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 16:28 To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < ) Cc: (NY) (FBI) < >; (NY) (FBI) <> Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents Will do. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun I, 2020 4:26 PM, " " < wrote: Understood, and thanks for letting us know. Let's keep in touch both on timing and also on whether there's a way to identify and categorize what's already been produced, or if we'll need to just get all the raw data at this stage and go from there. From: (NY) (FBI) <> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 16:23 To: (USANYS) [Contractor] < Cc: (NY) (FBI) c: >; Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents (NY) (FBI) <> EFTA00031890 Unfortunately, recent events and our staffing levels have conspired to put a kink in just about everything. If we can't make heads or tails of the stuff I've already produced, we'll do it again. They have told us that our staffing levels will be steadily increasing over the next few weeks, but I'm going to have to push back my estimate by a week or 2. Sorry about that. My next day in the office is Thursday, so I'll be able to see if I can easily identify what I already gave you and many it to a reliable identifier. NY CART Coordinator Senior Forensic Examiner cell desk On Jun 1, 2020 4:13 PM, " Thanks for this update — we'll take a look and circle back if any questions. > wrote: Separately, to follow up on a question from the May 15 email below, the list has just five devices as still pending to be transferred to us, and I think it's right that the plan is to reproduce all the materials so that we can get them in searchable format, but just wanted to confirm? Currently, we aren't able to match any of the prior productions to specific devices — so if we're able to match them up by Bates number now, that might work, but otherwise I think it makes sense for us to get everything. But let us know if any issue with that. And related to that question, are we still on track to get the full range of data in the next week or so? I don't think we've gotten any updates on that status in the past few weeks, and we're eager to be able to start reviewing. thanks again, From: (NY) (FBI) a> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 12:53 To: Cc: (NY) (FBI) Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents (USANYS) [Contractor] > (NY) (FBI) a> Updated item descriptions. Just a side note, many thumb drives and SD cards will not have a serial number visible externally, but will report one through our tools. I included those electronically reported serial numbers. Any questions, let me know. FBI NY CART Coordinator Senior Examiner From: Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 4:11 PM To: (NY) (FBI) a>: (USANYS) [Contractor] EFTA00031891 Cc: ; I c=; (NY) (FBI) <->; Subject: RE: Epstein search warrant documents (NY) (FBI) <a> Thanks for this, it's a helpful start. In terms of being able to write our search warrant, one additional piece of information we need is the serial number, or some other specific identifier, ideally for each device but at least for any device that there is more than one of the same thing. So for example, we need to be able to somehow differentiate the following devices — The two Dell power edge T310 hard drives (NYCO24323 and NYCO24324) The two Sony Vaio laptop / Fujitsu hdd (NYCO24336 and NYCO24337) the following loose storage devices: o Micro SD card (NYCO24339) o Flash Drive (generic) (NYCO24340) o Thumbdrive (Emtec) (NYCO24341) o hard drive (loose) (NYCO24342) o verbatim thumbdrive (NYCO24343) The four San Disk cruzer-thumbdrives (NYCO24344-47) The three Seagate IDE hard drives (NYCO24348-50) The camera SD card (NYCO24351) I think the rest of the devices are either specifically distinguishable and/or have an S/N listed. (By comparison, the USVI spreadsheet we have lists an s/n for about 20 of the 25(ish) devices. The other thing we're looking for is the location in the house (and ideally specific location) for each device, which the USVI list also has — is that info available? The list also has just five devices as still pending to be transferred to us, and I think it's right that the plan is to reproduce all the materials so that we can get them in searchable format, but just wanted to confirm? Currently, we aren't able to match any of the prior productions to specific devices — so if we're able to match them up by Bates number now, that might work, but otherwise I think it makes sense for us to get everything. But let us know if any issue with that. thanks very much, From: (NY) (FBI) <=.> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 15:54 To: > Cc: I (NY) (FBI) <:.; Subject: Re: Epstein search warrant documents (USANYS) [Contractor) . (NY) (FBI) <a> Here is The listing of all the evidence gathered in NY that I have. I added some columns to guide you to the unique numbers CART NY uses fro their evidence. The template wasn't a slam dunk over, so I did what I could to convey the information. If you are confused by anything, please let me know. In the column for approximate size, it is in GB, totaled at the bottom and converted to TB. In the materials contained column, I put what load file group the data was transferred over in (Mac, Windows, Loose Media, IDE, or Blacklight) If there is no entry in that column, that data has yet to be transferred. There are 2 Macs and a DVR you don't have as well as an