Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 115-cv-07433 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)/209.pdf

Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 209 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 1 Case 1:15-cv-07 433-RWS Document 202 Filed 06/13/16 Page 1 of 1 B O I E S, S C H I L L E R & F L E X N E R L L P 40i EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARD• SU!TE 200• FORT LAUDERDALE. Fl 33301-22 I• PH. 954.356.001' • FAX 954.356.0022 Via CM/ECF Honorable Judge Robert W. Sweet District Court Judge United States District Court 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Giuffre v. Maxwell June 13, 2016 Meredith Schultz, Esq. Email: mschultz@bsfUp.com IDJ~©~U\Yl~'QI- ~ JUN 1 4 2016 lJd) JUDGE SWEET CHAMBERS Case no. 15-cY-07433-RWS -Regarding Protective Order Dear Judge Sweet, This is a letter motion to file Ms. Giuffre's Reply in support of her Motion to Exceed Presumptive Ten Deposition Limit in Federal Rule Civil Procedure 30(A)(2)(a)(ii) and certain accompanying exhibits under seal pursuant to this Court's Protective Order (DE 62). The Protective Order states: Whenever a party seeks to file any document or material containing CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION with the Court in this matter, it shall be accompanie3d by a Motion to Seal pursuant to Section 6.2 of the Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions for the Southern District of New York. See Protective Order (DE 62) signed on March 17, 2016, at p. 4. Various depositions have been marked as confidential in this case. As Ms. Giuffre's Reply contains material that the parties have designated as confidential, she seeks leave to file the Non-Redacted Reply and certain related exhibits under seal. USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICAT Ty FILED DOC#: DATE FI:;-;LE~◄ D::-:-r,-,-+~;.__ SSM:sp Meredith Schultz, Esq. WWW.BSFLLP.COM