DOJ-OGR-00020548.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Header:** Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page62 of 92 **Document Content:** * **Case Information:** + Case Number: 22-1426 + Document Number: 3-2 + Date: 07/08/2022 + Page Number: 62 of 92 * **Table of Contents:** + Date: 11/12/2021 + Entries: - **LETTER MOTION** addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 12, 2021 re: Clarification re pseudonym order - Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rofirbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/12/2021) - **LETTER** by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 12, 2021 re: Co-Conspirator Statements Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 11/12/2021) - **ORDER** as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the Government's letter motion seeking clarification on two items from the November 1, 2021 pretrial conference. Dkt. No. 455. As to the first item, the Government seeks clarification about the line between permissible and impermissible cross-examination for witnesses testifying under a pseudonym. The Government's suggested level of generality as permissible cross-examination of the witness' careers would unduly curtail the Defendant's Sixth Amendment right to meaningful cross-examination. See United States v. Figueroa, 548 F.3d 222, 227 (2d Cir. 2008). The line of questioning the Government identifies may be relevant to a juror's credibility determination and thus the Court will not limit the Defendant's ability to pursue such questioning on cross-examination. As the Court noted at the November 1 conference, the Defendant may not elicit the name of a specific employer, but the type, 1, and genre of employment may be relevant to the jury's assessment of credibility. Nov. 1, 2021 Transcript at 11-12. As to the second item, the Government is ORDERED to submit a proposed order regarding sketch artist depictions of certain witnesses on or before November 18, 2021. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/12/2021) (ap) (Entered: 11/15/2021) - **LETTER** by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 12, 2021 re: Government Exhibit 52 Document filed by USA. (Moe, Alison) (Entered: 11/13/2021) - **TRANSCRIPT** of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 10/21/21 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Carol Gianley, (212) 805-0300. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/6/2021. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/14/2022. (Moya, Goretti) (Entered: 11/15/2021) - **NOTICE** OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 10/21/21 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (Moya, Goretti) (Entered: 11/15/2021) - **SEALED DOCUMENT** placed in vault. (mmo) (Entered: 11/15/2021) - **ORDER** as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Attached is a copy of the final jury questionnaire, which is the same as Dkt. No. 365, docketed on October 22, 2021, except that it incorporates the redline changes. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/15/2021) (ap) (Entered: 11/15/2021) - **ORDER** as to Ghislaine Maxwell: Voir dire for this matter is set to begin on November 16, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 518 of the United States District Court (Entered: 11/15/2021)