EFTA00979133.pdf

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> To: Stephen Hanson Subject: Re: Revised Separation Agreement Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:09:33 +0000 lets wait another hour to ask about substtinie points, 1-3/ On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Stephen Hanson wrote: From: Schechter, Jonathan A. [mallto: Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 2:40 PM To: Steve Hanson; Ellis Rinaldi; Barry Stemlicht Cc: Dan Yih; Eric Franklin; Stephenson, Tim; Chamas, Brandon S.; Subject: RE: Revised Separation Agreement Attached is a revised draft of the Assignment Agreement (clean and blackline) incorporating your comments except for the indemnity comment in section 2. We are not going to provide indemnities here. This is a clean break and parties are giving mutual releases. Whatever rights former members have under the Act they will have. Also, we do not understand the comment regarding the amendment. As soon as we sign this assignment we are free to amend and/or restate the LLC Agreement to whatever we want. As for points below--3 and 4 are fine. On #2, it was not an oversight. We were following your email which provided for 6 month consultation period following your resignation at year end. From: Steve Hanson lmailto: Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 11:57 AM To: Ellis Rinaldi; Barry Sternlicht Cc: Dan Yih; Eric Franklin; Stephenson, Tim; Charnas, Brandon S.; Schechter, Jonathan A. Subject: RE: Revised Separation Agreement Ellis, The NITS- 1. The document attached- assignment — 6 items to address. 2. I think there was an oversight on date consulting ends - should be June 15th not June 30th. 3. Please change organizations name on schedule VIII to NYC Hospitality Alliance. EFTA00979133 4. Page 12 7B 5 lines down- you have two the remove the, Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission and any fde or previous e-mail attached to it is intended to be viewed only by the party to which it is addressed and may contain valuable business information that is confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review. disclosure. dissemination or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Ellis Rinaldi [mailto: Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:02 AM To: Steve Hanson; Barry Sternlicht Cc: Dan Yih; Eric Franklin; Stephenson, Tim; Charnas, Brandon S.; Subject: RE: Revised Separation Agreement We will discuss 1-3 and get back to you. On 4 ... it is best if you give us all your comments. a minor markup of your remaining "nits" is best. Re "negligent disclosure" it has been in the past drafts and every atty knows what it means. Your counsel can explain it to you. Thx. From: Steve Hanson [mailto: Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:29 AM To: Barry Sternlicht Cc: Dan Yih; Ellis Rinaldi; Eric Franklin; Stephenson, Tim; Charnas, Brandon S.; Subject: RE: Revised Separation Agreement Barry. We are just about there. The lawyers are reviewing the language today, and we should be able to close today or tomorrow. A few questions/thoughts: 1. If you follow the previous email trail and document revisions from your side, the last document from your side agreed to the non-compete limited to NY and NJ, mirroring the agreement in our LLC operating agreement. When I asked for you to consider allowing a carve-out for 2 restaurants. I thought that the carve-out was for 2 restaurants located in NY and NJ. The last draft showed a change eliminating the opportunity for me to being able to work in the entire United States. except for 2 restaurants outside of NY and NJ? Thoughts? 2.1 think it reasonable that I should be given notice, if you guys think I breached our agreement and a period within which to cure the breach. mirroring all our other I also assume that as I am going to try to help you sell the co. that once sold I get my 500k and the non compete goes away separate from strip house. Is that right? 3 I am now told that you may no longer want to agree to the provisions in Section 12 of the Separation Agreement that the loser pays a penalty for bringing and losing an arbitration regarding Section 5(b)(ii) and non-payment under Section 5(d)? Is that true? Yesterdays draft of the Separation Agreement still includes the loser pays provision in Section 12. with a notation that says open. EFTA00979134 4. Obviously, some of the legal language in the documents needs small adjustment. For example, I don't know what "negligently discloses' covers at the beginning of Section 5(b)(iv). And I assume the assignment doc for stock should include assumptions as well as assignments. OthenNise. I think we are ready to go. Confidentiality Notice: This e-mad transmission and any fie or previous e-mail attached to it is intended to be viewed only by the party to which it is addressed and may contain valuable business information that is confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any review. disclosure. dissemination or use of any of the information contained m or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Schechter, Jonathan A. [mailto: Sent: Wednesda December 11 2013 3:41 PM To: ; Steve Hanson;I Cc: ; Stephenson, Tim; Charnas, Brandon S. Subject: Revised Separation Agreement Attached is a revised draft of the Separation Agreement (clean and blacklined against the prior draft), reflecting the latest correspondence between the parties. I am also attaching the Assignment Agreement for the membership interests. Please note the attached remains subject to any further comments Starwood may have. Best regards, Jonathan Jonathan A. Schechter, M. Kirkland & Ellis LLP 601 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 (O) (F) ************Io• • MI*• II**IN tap • **Io • • *Ho • II* ** tap • **IN• • *Ho • II* *IN tap • • IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) avoiding tax-related penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. EFTA00979135  The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by retum e-mail or by e-mail to I and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. IMPORTANT: The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential and is intended only for the named addressee(s). This message may be protected by the attorney/client privilege. If the reader of this e-mail message is not the intended recipient (or the individual responsible for the delivery of this e-mail message to the intended recipient). please be advised that any re-use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please reply to the sender that you have received this e-mail message in error and then delete it. Thank you. ******************11 ***iota p• **Io • . MI* • • • **to** *frith* *********1111• IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of (1) avoiding tax-related penalties under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Kirkland & Ellis LLP or Kirkland & Ellis International LLP. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by retum e-mail or by e-mail to I and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA00979136