053.pdf
ia-court-doe-no-4-v-epstein-no-9ː08-cv-80380-(sd-fla-2008) Court Filing 98.2 KB • Feb 13, 2026
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO. 08-80380-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO. 08-80381-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE & DISCOVERY DEADLINES,
REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION & REFERRING DISCOVERY MOTIONS TO
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2008 Page 1 of 6
2
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon receipt of the parties’ joint scheduling report.
It is thereupon, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
Trial Date & Location
1. This case is set for trial on the two-week calendar commencing Monday, January 25,
2010. Counsel for all parties shall appear at a calendar call commencing at 10:00 o’clock A.M. on
Friday, January 22, 2010. Unless instructed otherwise by subsequent order, the trial and all other
proceedings in this case shall be conducted at the U.S. Courthouse, 701 Clematis Street, Courtroom
4, Third Floor, West Palm Beach, Florida.
Motion Practice
2. Every motion filed in this case will be accompanied by one proposed original order
granting the motion. The order will contain an up-to-date service list of all attorneys in the case,
including e-mail addresses.
Pretrial Schedule
3. Pretrial discovery will be conducted in accordance with Local Rules 16.1 and 26.1 and
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. No pretrial conference shall be held in this action, unless the
Court determines, either sua sponte or upon motion and order, that a pretrial conference is
necessary. In setting the following deadlines, the Court has considered the parties’ suggested
discovery schedule. Dates and other agreements between the parties not otherwise addressed
herein shall be considered part of this Order. To the extent this Order conflicts with the Local
Rules, this Order supercedes the Local Rules.
Amend Pleadings/Add Parties-December 1, 2008
Discovery Cutoff–August 3, 2009
Substantive Pretrial Motions–August 31, 2009
Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2008 Page 2 of 6
3
Mediation Cutoff– 60 days before calendar call
Mandatory Pretrial Stipulation-Fifteen days before calendar call
Motions in Limine– Fifteen days before calendar call
Responses to Motions in Limine– Ten days before calendar call
Jury Instructions– Five days before calendar call
Proposed Findings & Conclusions– Five days before calendar call
Voir Dire Questions– Calendar call
Exhibit List for Court– First day of Trial
(impeachment excepted)
Witness List for Court– First day of Trial
(impeachment excepted)
Mandatory Pretrial Stipulation
4. Counsel must meet at least one month prior to the beginning of the trial period to confer
on the preparation of a Pretrial Stipulation in accordance with Local Rule 16.1E.
A Pretrial Stipulation lacking substance will not be accepted. Any party causing a unilateral
pretrial stipulation to be filed will be required to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed.
Each attorney and each self-represented party is charged with the duty of complying with this
Order. A motion for continuance shall not stay the requirement for the filing of the Pretrial
Stipulation and, unless an emergency situation arises, or good cause is shown, a motion for
continuance will not be considered unless it is filed at least twenty (20) days prior to the calendar
call. Failure to comply with the time schedule may result in dismissal or other sanctions.
Consent Jurisdiction
5. In light of the benefits offered by a trial before a magistrate judge, e.g., trial on a date
certain as opposed to placement on a trial calendar, the parties are urged to consider this option.
Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2008 Page 3 of 6
4
Therefore, within twenty (20) days of the entry of this order each attorney is ordered to meet with
his or her client and discuss this option. Plaintiff’s counsel shall monitor this process. If there is
not unanimity in favor of magistrate jurisdiction, plaintiff’s counsel need do nothing further. If,
however, there is unanimity in favor of magistrate jurisdiction, plaintiff’s counsel shall execute the
form (which can be retrieved from www.flsd.uscourts.gov) entitled “Notice of Right to Consent to
Disposition of a Civil Case by a United States Magistrate Judge,” and forward the original,
executed form to defendants’ counsel. After completion by all defendants or their counsel, the
original form should be forwarded to the Clerk of the Court, West Palm Beach Division.
Mediation
6. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule 16.2, this case is referred
to mediation, to the extent not excluded by Local Rule 16.2.C, as follows:
a. The mediation shall be completed sixty (60) days prior to the scheduled calendar
call;
b. The parties shall, within sixty (60) days hereof, agree upon a mediator and advise
the Clerk’s office of their choice, failing which the Clerk will designate a mediator from the list of
certified mediators on a blind random basis;
c. Plaintiff’s counsel shall be responsible for coordinating the mediation conference
date and location agreeable to the mediator and all counsel of record;
d. Within five (5) days following the mediation conference, the mediator shall file a
Mediation Report indicating who attended the mediation and the result thereof.
Discovery Referred to Magistrate Judge
7. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the
Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned cause is referred to United States Magistrate
Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2008 Page 4 of 6
5
Judge Linnea R. Johnson for appropriate disposition of all pretrial discovery motions, and all
motions that relate directly to these motions, such as motions for extension of time, motions for
reconsideration, motions for sanctions, and motions for mental or physical examinations. This
Order does not refer any motion which requests a continuance or extension of the trial or pretrial
scheduling dates.
Exhibits
8. Exhibits must be pre-marked and exchanged prior to execution of the Pretrial
Stipulation. Each exhibit should be marked with a sticker identifying the case number, exhibit
number, and party offering the exhibit.
Jury Instructions and Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
9. In cases tried before a jury, each party shall submit joint, stipulated proposed jury
instructions and a joint, stipulated proposed verdict form in hard copy form and on 3.5" diskette.
All requested instructions shall be typed on a separate page, and except for Eleventh Circuit Pattern
instructions, must be supported by citations of authority. Any objections to the proposed
instructions shall be stated clearly and concisely and also shall be supported by citations of
authority.
In cases tried before the Court, each party shall file proposed Findings of Fact &
Conclusions of Law in hard copy form and on 3.5" diskette. Proposed Conclusions of Law must be
supported by citations of authority.
Settlement
10. If a case is settled, counsel are directed to inform the Court promptly at (561) 561-514-
3790 and to submit an appropriate Stipulation for Order of Dismissal, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(a)(1). Such an Order must be filed within ten (10) days of notification to the Court, or prior to
Case 9:08-cv-80380-KAM Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2008 Page 5 of 6
6
the Calendar Call, whichever occurs first. Cas
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 3933df2e-b658-456f-af26-2635c1d7ca72
- Storage Key
- court-records/ia-collection/Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, No. 9ː08-cv-80380 (S.D. Fla. 2008)/Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, No. 9ː08-cv-80380 (S.D. Fla. 2008)/053.pdf
- Content Hash
- c28c8a235c0f559d3233fdebb7cd6b3b
- Created
- Feb 13, 2026