DOJ-OGR-00007089.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Header** * Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE * Document 465 * Filed 11/15/21 * Page 38 of 127 **Page Content** 1. THE COURT: From your perspective, anything further that could be addressed at this time or needs to be addressed? 2. MR. PAGLIUCA: On this topic your Honor? 3. THE COURT: Yes. 4. MR. PAGLIUCA: No. 5. THE COURT: Ms. Moe? 6. MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you. 7. THE COURT: The next is government 9 which is to preclude evidence or argument sounding in nullification. I agree with the defense that there is no need for me to rule on this presently. I trust that defense counsel knows well the clear rules around any such arguments so it is a bit hard to think about what guidance I can offer here. 8. MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. 9. Aside from the examples we proffered in our motion, there is nothing in particular that this motion is aimed at and so I don't think anything more along those lines to address today. 10. MS. STERNHEIM: Nothing at this time. 11. THE COURT: OK. So nothing referenced with respect to the government's concerns about nullification would be implicated in the anticipated opening? 12. MS. STERNHEIM: That is correct. **Footer** * SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. * (212) 805-0300 * DOJ-OGR-00007089