EFTA01008819.pdf
dataset_9 pdf 244.0 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 4 pages
From: J <jeevacation®gmail.com>
To: Valeria Chomsky
Subject: Re: Vincent's reply
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:46:33 +0000
i tried a few time he was always " on the phone"
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:21 AM Valeria Chomsky <a> wrote:
I would like to write the following:
Vincent,
There is no "seller's remorse the day after", and I think you and Jason achieved a very good result.
My point is about the information we have available, it is not to question the amount of the settlement, but to
have the truth established about the assets of the trust on December 31, 2014, since they provided a false
information. There is no reason to accept the false information when we have the documents proving it.
And I don't see why the acknowledgements wouldn't be possible.
Valeria
What do you think?
Valeria
Forwarded message
From: Vincent Pisegna a
Date: Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:30 AM
Subject: RE: URGENT
To: Valeria Chomsky Jason B. Curtin
Cc: Noam Chomsky
Good morning.
Yesterday, we discussed at length the choice you faced. You could settle early on acceptable terms but to do
so, it required foregoing further investigation into the facts of the case. Or, alternatively, you could choose not
to settle and embark on discovery and a further investigation of the facts. You very clearly chose that further
litigation was not in Noam and your best interests because of the stress that would be involved in further
litigation and that closure was of paramount importance. Also, the settlement is a very good deal for you. This
is not an unusual judgment for a client to make and it is also not unusual to have "seller's remorse" the day
after a settlement. I do not think we can rescind the agreement and it doesn't sound like you want to rescind
the agreement. We successfully negotiated for a release of you so let's see what we can put into the release. I
do not think we will be able to negotiate the acknowledgements you reference.
Feel free to call if you want to talk about this.
EFTA01008819
Vincent J. Pisegna
Krokidas & Bluestein LLP
600 Atlantic Avenue
Boston, MA 02210
www.kb-law.com
From: Valeria Chomsky
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2019 10:06 AM
To: Vincent Pisegna ; Jason B. Curtin < >
Cc: Noam Chomsky
Subject: URGENT
Vincent and Jason,
First of all, thank you very much for solving this constant and stressful situation in our life.
I would like to make some comments that I think are of paramount importance.
We keep finding outrageous false information from Max and Harry, such as that the funds in the Marital Trust
was only $1,000,000 until the Lexington house was sold and incorporated to it. This is a flat lie -- as the
documents I sent you prove it (Bainco statement from December 2014 and Harry's e-mail from May 2015,
when the Lexington house was sold).
Also outrageous to say that the Trust was providing a house to Noam, when the apartment in Cambridge was
bought with half of a mortgage with a commercial institution that we were paying monthly and with half of the
funds coming from a loan from the Marital Trust with the highest possible interest rate, when Noam could
have bought it himself with the funds from his IRA, that was being distributed to them. The only reason for
this loan from the Marital Trust was to have the apartment tied to the trust and not allow to have it as a jointly
EFTA01008820
owned property with me, as Noam requested many times. Requests very well documented in e-mails
exchanges.
There are numberless other examples of them acting in bad faith and since it has been a pattern from them,
with their father being competent and productive, I have to express my concerns for the future, if Noam and/or
I become somehow limited in our cognitive capacities and they try to manipulate again or if Noam dies before
me and they contest Noam's will.
Although we preferred a settlement, if we would have gone to court, much more would be discovered and we
would have the documents that now we are missing to prove what had been done wrong. With the settlement
we won't have access to them anymore.
It seems to me that the moment requires that in their releases they acknowledge explicitly that they recognized
all the gifts they have received from Noam in the form of trusts for them, trusts for the grandchildren, the
Lexington house, the Wellfleet house, royalties for children and grandchildren, payment of expenses,
distributions from Noam's IRA to them, justifying the settlement, and now the Marital Trust where Noam is
waiving most of his rights to it, and most important also correct through the documents that I provided (Bainco
statement and the email from Harry) that the Marital Trust in December 31, 2014 had a market value of
$2,502,581, and that the Lexington house was sold in May 2015, therefore it was not the proceeds from the
house that elevated the assets of the Marital Trust from $1,000,000 to the current value -- as they falsely stated.
It also should include that they recognize that the money that Noam was left with, it is for him to live his life
with his wife, and that if some is left (hopefully Noam will live long enough to use it all) they agree that Noam
decided to leave in his will only to his wife, Valeria. Therefore with this settlement, they are not going to
contest Noam's will or claim any additional funds.
I think we have to address this information, or we will be signing that all the false information they gave us is
correct and risk to have more problems in the future.
We accept the agreement, but we don't have to accept their false information.
I should add that the only reason I don't want to go to Court is because I don't want to cause more stress to
Noam. Otherwise, I would much prefer to go to Court and have all the issues clarified, as I see the non-
clarification of them as potential future problems and accusations.
Valeria Chomsky
EFTA01008821
Forwarded message
From: Valeria Chomsky
Date: Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 6:34 PM
Subject: Fake news
To: Vincent Pisegna Jason B. Curtin
Cc: Noam Chomsky
One of the main characteristics of so-called "postmodern" societies is to disregard the difference between
objective and subjective, truth and lie, reality and fiction.
This case is a striking example of the contempt of objective reality by a large number of people who have
preferred to believe the lie that coincides with their previous opinions. The famous "fake news" prevailed over
reality, the belief about reason.
The attachment shows the Carol Chomsky Exempt Marital Trust, on December 31, 2014 with a market value
of $2,502,581.
And the email copied below shows that the Lexington house was sold in May 2015.
Something is not right in their allegations.
Valeria Chomsky
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA01008822
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 3795c6b8-9274-4db8-aee9-24262c17a7f6
- Storage Key
- dataset_9/EFTA01008819.pdf
- Content Hash
- 7735c47c13d432577d8e616e675d5b87
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026