EFTA02544720.pdf
dataset_11 pdf 1000.2 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 9 pages
From: Valeria Chomsky <
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2017 2:20 PM
To: jeffrey E.
Cc: Noam Chomsky
Subject: Fwd: Clarifications
Jeffrey,
Before our call, could you please r=ad the e-mail below? This is from January and February 2017, but it shows =eborah's
position then, but how she disguised it. The blue font =s Deborah's comments to Noam's letter to his children, and my
comm=nts in green with my initials (VC). You can see that, then, Deborah =nsisted that the Trustees were not part of
Noam's estate and that I wo=Id be receiving Noam's full estate -- which is a false statement4=A0 Noam has also two
IRAs and although Noam wanted to put both in my names= I told him that the one he "inherited from Carol" should go
to =is children.
Noam thinks that Deborah has b=en very cooperative and helpful. But we know why.
Valeria
Forwarded message
F=om: Deborah Pechet Quinan < <mailto >>
Date: Tu=, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: Clarifications
To: Valeria Ch=msky < <mailto », Gene Landy <
<mailto
Cc: Noam Chomsky < <mailto >>
Dear Valeria,
I agree with you completely! Ple=se see my explanation and comments below. I hope they are helpful.=C2* I'm happy
to talk as well, any time.
All my best,
<=pan class="gmail-">
Deborah
Deborah Pechet Quinan, Esq. LL.M.
Shareholder
EFTA_R1_01697538
EFTA02544720
Chair, Trusts & Estates Group
255 State Street, 7th Floor I Boston, M= 02109
Direct: <tel: > I Cell:
Assistant - Jayne Mahoney:
Office: <tel: > I Fax: = <tel:
e-mail: > www.riw.com I
From: Valeria Chomsky [mailto >1
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 1:10 PM
To: Deborah Pechet Quinan; Gene Tandy
Cc: Noam Chomsky; Valeria Chomsky
Subject: Clarifications
Deborah,
I would like to have things even clearer and l=think the nomenclature we use is extremely important to establish the
trut= of the facts and not give false ideas and illusions to anyone, including =urselves (Noam and me) in our
communication. So I would like if you could review the files and let us know about these =ssues.
First, I think we need to refer to the IRA acc=unts by their identification numbers, not as the "large" or &quo=;smaller",
even because the one that is larger it had been used for o=her family members (distributions, taxes, Wellfleet, medical
expenses, etc) and might become the "smaller,", even because it =eep being used for our living costs and other expenses
(mortgage, lawyers,=accountant, etc). DPQ: Thi= is a good idea. By "identification numbers" do you =ean the account
numbers at Bainco (which will change when you change managers) or =ome other numbers?
Noam's estate (even when he is not</=> making use of it, has no access to it, or has transferred it to his c=ildren), as far
as I know, involves the following:
1) IRA Accounts
(Bainco has listed at least three different Ac=ount numbers when sending the "IRA/ESA Distribution Request" For=s, so I
am not sure how many there are for sure, but the Account numbers t=at have appeared in Bainco's forms are the
following ABA500094, ABA950422, ABA950307. These Accounts were recently renamed as &=uot;A2A" replacing the
"ABA", but maintaining their followi=g respective numbers.
2
EFTA_R1_01697539
EFTA02544721
2) Noam Chomsky Revocable Trust=/u>
3) Carol Chomsky Non-Exempt Trust
4) Carol Chomsky Exempt Trust=/u>
5) Gull Haven Lane <=p>
6) Lexington house
7) Noam's Intellectual Property<=u>
8) Cambridge Apartment (subject to a mo=tgage and a loan to Carol Trust)
Items (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) already have =oam's children as the beneficiaries.
From these assets Noam has designated one of t=e IRAs to me. So, it is NOT correct to say that "Valeria receives the
totality of Noam's estate&quo=; -- as you wrote. DPQ: We are speaking from two different per=pectives, I as a lawyer
for whom the term "estate" technic=lly means everything passing from Noam at his death. This would be Noam's IRAs,
the Cambridge home (in his name currently), his intel=ectual property, and his tangible personal property. I don't=think
he has rights to change the disposition of Carol's trusts or=Gull Haven Lane at his death. I will check. You are receiving
the totality of the assets that Noam can pass to another at his death, exc=pt for what is in his revocable trust (until the
trust is revised after we=meet in March) and possibly the smaller of the two IRAs (I do not have the=beneficiary
designation yet). You receive these under the terms of his new Will. Does this help? l=am happy to use the terminology
you are most comfortable with, and I am gl=d that you raised this issue. Thank you.
When Bainco s=nds us the forms for the IRA distribution, they do not always include the =RA account from which the
withdrawal is being made. Noam used to sig= the forms without having the information filled in. But considering the
amount that was available in the larger IRA in 2015 an= the one that is there now, it seems that most, if not ALL the
major distributions are being made from therIRA account that Noam has designated me as the beneficiary. Our livi=g
expenses, taxes, Wellfleet rent, distribution to 10 family members seeme= to have been withdrawn from this one IRA
though this is now not being done. So if something is left from this IRA, I will =e entitled to receive whatever is left there.
DPQ: Yes. This is my understanding a= well. I believe you can also be named the beneficiary of the smaller IRA if Noam
would like that. I will check on this and on the=current designation when I receive the documents from Bainco. We wil=
3
EFTA_R1_01697540
EFTA02544722
be able to plan for the best account for the distributions to come out of=as we make progress in understanding the
whole situation. The materials from Bainco will help a great deaL=C2.
I have some additi=nal comments below (in green).
Valeria
Forwar=ed message
From: Deborah Pechet Quinan < <mailto >>
Date: Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 3:22 PM
Subject: FW: Letter from the three of us (Avi, Diane, Harry)
To: "Valeria Chomsky ( >)„
<mailto
> &g=;, "Noam Chomsky (
<mailto > )" < <mailto >>
Cc: Gene Landy < <mailto >>
Dear Valeria and Noam,
Please see my clarifying comments embe=ded in the text of the letter, below, and please let me know if you have any
questions or comments.
Best,
Deborah
Deborah Pechet Quinan, Esq. LL.M.
Shareholder
Chair, Trusts & Estates Group
255 State Street, 7th Floor I Boston, M= 02109
Direct: <tel: > =C24> Cell: <tel:-> </=pan>
Assistant - Jayne Mahoney:
Office: <tel: pan style="font-size:11ptfont-family:Calibri,sans-
serif;color:rgb(31,73=125)"> I Fax: <tel: > <=pan style="font-size:llpt;font-
family:Calibri,sans-serif;colocr l .,73=125)">
e-mail: -< > www.riw.com j
4
EFTA_R1_01697541
EFTA02544723
From:=span style="font-size:l0ptfont-family:Tahoma,sans-seritcolor:black"> V=leria Chomsky
<mailto >1
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 12:41 PM
To: Gene Landy
Subject: Fwd: Letter from the three of us (Avi, Diane, Harry)=u>
Gene,
<1=>
Hope the operation=went well.
<1=>
Thank you so much =or your advice. Noam wrote this answer and I think it is polite and covers=everything. Do you have
any advice?
<1=>
Valeria
<1=>
<1=>
Forwarded message
From: Noam Chomsky < <mailto■ >>
Date: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:30 PM
Subject: Fwd: Letter from the three of us (Avi, Diane, Harry)
To: Valeria Chomsky < <mailto >>
Very good to talk to you yesterday evening, Diane.
Read your letter carefully of course. Many times.. And needless=to say, very glad to know of your concerns. I would,
however, like t= clarify some very serious misconceptions.
I have no idea what information you are receiving, but it is completely fal=e. In fact, I do not even understand how you
are receiving this info=mation. Whatever the source, it is radically wrong. We have in=fact seen some highly misleading
information from Bainco. In the category of our expenses, they have included all sort= of things that do not belong
there, such as distributions, airline expens=s but not the fact these were reimbursed as planned, and many other quite
=isleading calculations. However, whatever the source of what you have heard, it is completely mistaken.
Our expenses in fact have gone down, but not entirely. In Lexington w= were living rent free. As I explained to Avi, I
thought the house w=s in my name, and we would never have agreed with the advice from Max and =am to move into
an apartment in Cambridge if we hadn't thought that the sale of the Lexington house would cover =he new apartment.
That was very bad advice, and if I'd known tha= I did not own the Lexington house, I never would have accepted it.
As it now stands, we have expenses for the apartment that we never had befo=e. We cannot figure out what is
happening to royalties, but we are b=rely receiving them. There is virtually no pension because, about 20=years ago, it
was restructured as an IRA which we then invested in the estate that will be left to the three of you=when I die. DPQ: Is
this=the smaller IRA at Bainco? The large one is being left to Valeria based on the change in ben=ficiary designation
5
EFTA_R1_01697542
EFTA02544724
that you informed us of, and regarding which I await w=itten documentation from Bainco when they provide the
materials I have requested.
VC: There are three IRA accounts, acco=ding to the IRA/ESA Distribution Request Forms that Bainco has been sendin= us
along the years, as I mentioned above in this letter. I would like if you could check on this. DPQ: Of course. As soon as
we =et the materials from Bainco.
<=LI>
As I also explained to Avi, years ago when the estate was planne=, the prime concern of the lawyers was avoiding estate
taxes. The in=estments were assigned to trusts in Mommy's name, since we assumed that I would die first.4>=A0 The
intention of course was that the money would be available to the su=vivor, but things did not work out as we had
anticipated and now, as the trusts are written, it seems that I have no access to them. OPQ:40=A0 This is not entirely
accurate as Noam is the income beneficiary of thes= trusts and must receive all the net income annually, and he is also
entit=ed to principal distributions as the trustees "consider advisable". At my death, =he estate goes to you. D=Q:
Carol's trusts are left to the children at Noam's=death. Except for the small amount of assets currently in Noam4>=99s
revocable trust (we will be updating this trust after we meet in March), Noam's es=ate is left to Valeria under the terms
of his new will and pursuant to the=beneficiary designation of the large IRA at Bainco which I am awaiting
doc=mentation to confirm. The term "estate" references the totality of a decedent's assets so the balance of C=rol's
estate, i.e. the Marital Trusts, go to the children, but Noa='s estate does not.
VC: We have not been informed that Noam has been=receiving ANY of the Trusts net income nor principal distributions.
<=span>DPQ: Yes, this is a concern. When we receive the materials from Bainco we=should be able to determine where
the required net income distributions ar= being deposited. Principal is paid at the discretion of the trustees.40=A0 They
made some principal distributions to pay Noam's income taxes and estimates last year.<=>
That leaves us with the IRA. I did not realize this, but t=ough Bainco was aware that the IRA was my only source of
funds, and was of=course diminishing, they continued to make distributions to ten family recipients. We were al=o
paying almost $50,000 a year for Wellfleet, and paying other expenses, l=ke Alex's medical bills. It seems that we were
also paying taxes=for the entire estate. DPQ: I think Noam is refe=ring to Carol's Marital Trusts here. Am I correct?
4>=A0
VC: No, Deborah. The money for all this ha= been coming from distributions from the IRA (and most of it, if not ALL,
=rom the one Noam has designated me as the beneficiary). DPQ:=C24, Thanks Valeria.
Just to give you an idea of the scale, there is an automatic $30=,000 deduction a year from the IRA. DPQ: In the interest
of being accurate the Minimum Required Distribution changes somewhat each =ear depending on market fluctuations
and Noam's age. This is=not a deduction from the IRA, rather, this is the minimum distribution to =oam as required
under our tax laws. This is perhaps just a semantic point. Distributions and taxes come close to the total deduction
from t=e IRA, and other expenses of the kind just mentioned (plus Anthony) carry =xpenses well beyond the funds
coming in.
VC: Although a requirement under the tax laws, t=e distributions (withdrawals) from the IRA were being used for
donations t= family members and other expenses that we should not be responsible for, considering that the IRA =s the
only stable source of money left for Noam. DPQ: Agreed.
Plainly, we cannot continue any of this while living on a diminishing IFtA.-C2. I did request that a marital trust pay the
taxes on the IRA, but Har=y insisted on conditions that I could not possibly accept, and I was very =urprised, frankly, that
any conditions were even considered. Perhaps that had to do with the serious miscon=eptions about our expenses,
whatever their source.
6
EFTA_R1_01697543
EFTA02544725
Naturally, I want make sure that when I die, Valeria will at lea=t have a place to live and something to live on. 0PQ: I
might re-word this=as it is Noam's intent as expressed to me and Gene that Valeria re=eives the totality of Noam's
estate, and not just an amount that w=ll give her subsistence.
VC: Again, Deborah. This is the main and extreme=y important point of my letter. I might be entitled to receive
whate=er will be left from one of the IRA, if something will be left, but not the "totality" of Noam's =state. DPQ: I
hope=l was able to clarify above what I meant. I think the lack of clarit= here stems from the fact that Noam earned
everything and a lot of those assets were placed in Carol's name prior to her death for estate t=x minimization purposes,
so they became part of "Carol's e=tate". I am happy to include these items in the term 4>=9CNoam's estate" if you wish
as that reflects the totality=of assets that pass at Noam's death, whether through trusts set up by Carol (the Marit=l
Trusts) or from Noam directly.
She came here, abandoning everything in Brazil, to be with me in-tiny last years. We are very happy together, and care
for each other.=C2* It is a joy I never anticipated after Mommy died and after the years I spent alone.</=>
That's the situation. It is entirely different from wh=t you heard. Again, I do not know what the source of your
informatio= is, but it is completely inaccurate.
I should add, perhaps, that in earlier years, I was indeed carel=ss about expenses, leaving it to Mommy. Valeria has
taken over, and =or the past three years, both of us have been monitoring expenses carefully and know exactly what i=
coming in and what is being spent. We have all the facts very clear=y laid out, and are planning accordingly. I am glad
that the three o= you will be well taken care of from the estate, the way it was planned years ago. DPQ: As above the
reference here should be to Carol.=99s Marital Trusts, just to be clear that the that is the children40=99s inheritance.
VC: I disagree, Deborah. The reference here shou=d be to what corresponds to reality -- Noam's children will=be taken
care from his estate. Not only from Carol's Marital Trust that were composed by Noam as the grantor, =stablished to
make use of the guarantees for the children and tax issues, =ut still part of Noam's estate, as we all know. DPQ:
Understood.
Frankly, I always assumed that I would be able to disregard fina=cial concerns in my last years, but as a result of careless
and faulty dec=sions taken long ago, and some bad recent advice, that is not the way things are turning ou=.
D=/u>
<1=>
<1=>
On Sun, Jan 29, 20=7 at 10:35 PM, Diana Chomsky < <mailto >>
wrote:=/p>
Dear Doddoy and Valeria,
It was really nice to talk to both of you just now - we'll have to =o it more often.
As I mentioned, I'm sending you a letter from all three of us (Avi =nd Harry in copy).
We decided to write this letter because we are very worried about what =e've been hearing from you about your
financial situation and the =mount of stress it is causing you. We have been worried for many months now, but the
situation seems to be be=oming more and more dire and we feel like we can't just stand by a=d watch it happen any
more. We want to help find solutions that might be l=ss drastic than what we understand you are considering.
7
EFTA_R1_01697544
EFTA02544726
We have heard you express that you don't have enough money, and thi= is leading you to make big decisions that we're
afraid could have har=ful consequences for you. Moving is exhausting, and moving twice in three years even more so.
We would hate to=see you to leave your condo unless you somehow aren't happy there. Mov=ng out of the Boston area
would be more disruptive still -- again, we'= happily support that if it's what you both want for yourselves, but you
shouldn't have to do it because of m=sconceptions about money. Teaching classes could be both rewarding and
dra=ning for you; doing it just to chase down a little bit of extra salary mon=y does not make sense in your
circumstances. And we definitely don't want to see you drop services that are importa=t to your research and your
legacy, like your journal subscriptions or Ant=ony's invaluable work on your publications.
Most of all, we are concerned that you are experiencing such high level= of stress that are simply misplaced.
We don't understand why you need to worry about money. We know that=you have several million dollars in your IRA
and that you receive hundreds=of thousands of dollars each year in IRA distributions, as well as significant income from
royalties and oth=r sources. Of course, many of your expenses have risen, because of some wo=derful changes you've
made in your life: adding Valeria to the family,=moving to Cambridge, and enjoying some sightseeing as part of your
travels. We've been thrilled to see your l=fe develop like this. We were relieved that money did not pose an obstacle=to
you living this phase of your life in the best way possible for you, as=well as providing some long-term support for
Valeria.
But something else has changed very dramatically in the way your money =s flowing. Your spending has shot up, way out
of proportion to the expense= we're aware of. It looks to us as if the money is just disappearing. You have enough
money to support =he lifestyle you and Valeria have been living, but not enough to keep spen=ing at the rate you have
been.
We understand that it is distressing and even frightening to worry abou= the money running out. We can see why you
are grasping for solutions like=considering disruptive lifestyle changes and looking for other sources of money. We know
these decisions ar= ultimately up to the two of you to take, but they are not the solutions w= want for you. We don't
want you to suffer the strain and dislocation;=and also we don't believe these small changes to your cash flow will solve
the bigger problem of your startlingl= high spending rate. Some may even cost more money than they save.<=pan
style="color:black">
We believe that you two -- while you are both brilliant at so many thin=s -- have never developed the practical skills of
money management. Your t=oubles began when you stopped working cooperatively with the professionals who had
always succeeded in h=lping you meet your goals in the past. We want you to find some financial =rofessional who can
help you live your lives comfortably and free of finan=ial worry. They can help you outline your goals, both as two
individuals and as a couple; show you what resourc=s you have; figure out if you have enough to meet your goals; figure
out i= you have been spending money faster than you need to; and suggest the lea=t painful compromises you might
make to save money, if that proves necessary after all. They can do this w=th utmost discretion. But you need to make it
a priority to find the right=person, communicate promptly and openly with them, and take their advice s=riously.
It pains us to see you trying to figure it all out on your own and comi=g up with horrifying and ineffective solutions. You
should be enjoying you= life together and feeling confident about your futures. You've earned a lot of money through a
l=fetime of hard work -- please get the help you need to use it effectively.=/span>
You also need to make a clear decision about the role you want the rest=of your family to have in your financial affairs.
The three of us would be=delighted to join you and your financial advisor in discussing the whole family's circumstances,
incl=ding the history of your estate planning and the many gifts you've giv=n us. We used to discuss this regularly with
Max and Bainco, and they woul= help us develop unified plans to meet the whole extended family's needs. Meetings like
this don't requir= us to share all the details of our private financial affairs with each ot=er, the way one does with one's
individual advisor -- but the more we =hare, the more opportunities we may find to help each other. It is up to you
whether to continue this kind of open dis=ussion with us.
8
EFTA_R1_01697545
EFTA02544727
=riting this letter is not something we are undertaking lightly. We are doi=g this because we are truly, deeply, concerned
about your acute distress a=d about what this is doing to your relationships with your loved ones (especially us).
Love, Avi, Diane and Harry
Oxfam works with others to overcome pov=rty and suffering
O=fam GB is a member of Oxfam International and a company limited by guarant=e registered in England No. 612172.
Registered office: Oxfam House, John Smith Drive, Cowley, Oxford, OX4 21Y.<=r> A registered charity in England and
Wales (no 202918) and Scotland (SC 0390=2)
</a
</=>
NOTICE: This email with its attachments, if an=, is intended solely for permitted use by authorized recipients. If you ar=
not an authorized recipient of this email, your retention, transmission, =isclosure, or use of this email is prohibited. If
you received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete t=is email and its attachments from your devices
and systems.
NOTICE: This email with its attachments, if any, is intended solely for per=itted use by authorized recipients. If you are
not an authorized recipient=of this email, your retention, transmission, disclosure, or use of this em=il is prohibited. If
you received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email and it= attachments from your devices
and systems.
9
EFTA_R1_01697546
EFTA02544728
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 3277b7c5-491c-4211-9771-39e25aaeaea7
- Storage Key
- dataset_11/EFTA02544720.pdf
- Content Hash
- 6c6598788e28a6594ee24f215543e799
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026