DOJ-OGR-00000855.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Case 21-770, Document 1-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page16 of 24** **Header:** Case 21-770, Document 1-2, 03/24/2021, 3065965, Page16 of 24 **Table 1:** | **12/10/2020** | **93** | **TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: Conference held on 7/14/2020 before Judge Alison J. Nathan. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Kristen Caramante, (212) 805-0300. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/31/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/11/2021. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2021. (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)** | | --- | --- | --- | | **12/10/2020** | **94** | **NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT as to Ghislaine Maxwell. Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 7/14/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days.... (McGuirk, Kelly) (Entered: 12/10/2020)** | | **12/14/2020** | **95** | **ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: On December 8, 2020, Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell filed her renewed application for bail under seal with proposed redactions, in accordance with this Court's December 7, 2020 Order, see Dkt. No. 89. The Government did not file any opposition to the Defendant's proposed redactions. After due consideration, the Court will adopt the Defendant's proposed redactions. The Court's decision to adopt those redactions is guided by the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosh v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this test, the Court must: (i) determine whether the documents in question are "judicial documents;" (ii) assess the weight of the common law presumption of access to the materials; and (iii) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access. Ids; and at 11920) balance competing considerations against the presumption of access.