Epstein Files

EFTA00728696.pdf

dataset_9 pdf 400.2 KB Feb 3, 2026 3 pages
pp& IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 502008CA028051)000MB AB Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. ORDER ON EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL, FOR SANCTIONS, TO STRIKE PLEADINGS AND FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Epstein's Motion To Compel, For Sanctions, To Strike Pleadings And For Contempt Of Court, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion is hereele4k i%.:1 7; (i7 , 74044 441€44c414,dore.eas tefitayeat fir SAststSou- 41, setieder re--ettet 600eanicederi ;014' , 4ea t-e-04 frait- 10 1-49 ) AerZle DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Court ouse, West Palm Beach, Florida, this 02- day of / 07 --: , 2009. e C* Judge Copies furnished: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, PA, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, PA, 644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250, Jacksonville, FL 32211 EFTA00728696 IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA L.M., CASE NO. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TERMINATE DEPOSITION, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE. FOR A TWO-HOUR TIME LIMIT ON COMPLETION OF THE DEPOSITION THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion To Terminate Deposition, Or In The Alternative, For A Two-Hour Time Limit On Completion Of The Deposition, and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby COW, Dago, ORDERED and ADJUDGE D that Plaintiff'ss Motion is hereby grentedkie ftlech 1114-. WEElioex-fr etb4iTro Aka ti-occa r4 .6 &us£ NcsiTliceLL,C.Ct.d.5../t a geO^r-6 /1.00-44-34-4 zdfiVest. 0 0 Atedg-zsie ( 041 keirse PC V-4150 A O DER D at Palm Beach County r ourtifotfisfetrt Palm Beach, i retyyse.4 /-* Florida, this 3 day of , 2009. Aearfrogerea Don Circui udge Copies furnished: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PI E, ES.., 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and JACK A GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Afterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and JAY HOWELL, ESQ., Jay Howell & Associates, P.A., 644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250, Jacksonville, FL 32211 EFTA00728697 IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA L.M., CASE NO. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. ORDER DENYING L.M.'S EMERGENCY MOTION AND AGREED ORDER ON USE OF VIDEO DEPOSITION OF L.M. AND EPSTEIN THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Emergency Motion for Enforcement of Order Granting Leave to Proceed Anonymously through Sealing of her Deposition, and the Court having been advised by counsel, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 1. Motion to seal is denied. - 2. However, the parties have agreed that neither L.M. nor Jeffrey Epstein's video depositions (i.e. the actual video vs. the written transcript) shall be provided to the press or any person who is not their attorneys (or a member of their staff), the parties themselves or their experts nor shall the video depositions be filed with the clerk or in the court file without a reasonable legal purpose, nor shall any party or their legal representative who is in attendance at the Plaintiff or Defendant's video depositions (who may obtain.., a copy of same) violate this order. 3. Should either LM or Jeffrey Epstein, or their attorneys, determine that the video depositions need to be filed, they shall provide a10-day notice by fax to opposing counsel who shall have the opportunity to object by filing a protective order. The parties shall wait until the court has ruled on such a motion before filing the video deposition, if allowed. The parties may request an in-camera viewing, if appropriate. 4. Sanctions shall be granted for a violation of this order. DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County CourgatAMOrlatEli, Florida, this day of , 2009. NOV 0 2 20O9 JUDGE DONALD W. HAFL Donald Hafele Circuit Court Judge EFTA00728698

Entities

0 total entities mentioned

No entities found in this document

Document Metadata

Document ID
2f973e11-14bb-4e3d-8373-9a69da35e76d
Storage Key
dataset_9/EFTA00728696.pdf
Content Hash
5e2c367387611a49456f769cf81fddd6
Created
Feb 3, 2026