DOJ-OGR-00010106.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Image Extraction** **Header:** * **Case Number:** C2grdau4 * **Court:** THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman. * **Redirect Examination** * **By:** MR. SHECHTMAN: * **Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that correct? * **A. Yes.** **Page Number:** 366 **Text:** 1. C2grdau4 2. THE COURT: Mr. Shechtman. 3. REDIRECT EXAMINATION 4. BY MR. SHECHTMAN: 5. Q. Mr. Schoeman, just to be clear, on May 13th or sometime thereafter Ms. Trzaskoma told you that she had rejected the conclusion that Juror No. 1 was a suspended attorney, is that correct? 6. A. Yes. 7. MR. SHECHTMAN: Very good. 8. MR. OKULA: Nothing else, your Honor. 9. THE COURT: Mr. Schoeman, did you get any understanding from Ms. Trzaskoma as to why it was that she was sharing this information or her deliberative process with you? 10. THE WITNESS: I didn't have an understanding. We, having spent many months of trial together, often shared information. It was consistent with our pattern of sharing information during the course of the trial. But I have described I think the entirety of the conversation. 11. THE COURT: Anything further? 12. MR. OKULA: Nothing. Thank you, your Honor. 13. THE COURT: You're excused. You may step down. (Witness excused) 14. MR. SHECHTMAN: Mr. Parse calls Barry Berke of the same law firm. 15. BARRY H. BERKE, SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 **Footer:** * **DOJ-OGR-00010106**