EFTA00732362.pdf
dataset_9 pdf 120.8 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 2 pages
From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>
To: Martin Weinberg
Subject: Re: Fw: SORNA Letter
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:36:03 +0000
nothing attached
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Martin Weinberg < > wrote:
Hopefully, with several minor edits, you will be receiving Stephanie's opinion letter today
-- Original Message --
From: Martin Weinberg
To: Ste hanie Thacker Darren Indft
Cc:
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: SORNA Letter
1. I would now omit fn 1
2. I would consider, at the very end of your conclusory bulletpoints on pg 10 of the attached letter,
adding language from your transmittal email:
"in my view federal SORNA obligations as to individuals who are classified as sex offenders are limited to the
act of registering and updating registration. Knowing failures to conform to those federal obligations can alone
put a citizen at risk of federal prosecution. However, all other sex offender registration issues are subject to
state law. In particular, the requirements for individual state registration, and maintaining such registration, are
within the purview of the individual state registration schemes"
3. Note I have eliminated the "especially" believing it creates an unnecessary question regarding which law to
follow as to states that have conformed eg Florida if there remain differences
4. I would also consider adding a final sentence "Further, issues including those relating to the manner of
providing notice of travel are matters exclusively governed by the laws of the respective states in which you
have registererd"
Original Message ---
From: Stephanie Thacker
To: Darren Indyke
Cc: Martin Weinberg
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 1:10 PM
Subject: SORNA Letter
Attached for your consideration is a draft of my analysis of the interplay between SORNA registration
requirements and what is required to maintain registration with relevant state sex offender registries—
specifically, the Virgin islands.
For the record, please disregard my September 24, 2010 letter in this regard inasmuch as it was based on a
misapprehension of certain key facts.
EFTA00732362
As detailed in the attached, in my view federal SORNA obligations as to individuals who are classified as
sex offenders are limited to the act of registering and updating registration. Knowing failures to conform to
those federal obligations can alone put a citizen at risk of federal prosecution. However, all other sex
offender registration issues are subject to state law. In particular, the requirements for individual state
registration, and maintaining such registration, are within the purview of the individual state registration
schemes-especially when such states have not implemented SORNA.
Please let me know if you have questions.
Stephanie D. Thacker
Allen Guthrie & Thomas, PLLC
500 Lee Street East
Suite 800
Charleston, West Virginia 25301
(direct)
(fax)
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
Jeffrey Epstein
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments.
EFTA00732363
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 2ac1adc4-c282-428e-a5af-126376719c78
- Storage Key
- dataset_9/EFTA00732362.pdf
- Content Hash
- 2f04258681a36c03c20b5dfd3d078ca1
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026