DOJ-OGR-00016756.pdf

--- Page 1 --- **Document Header:** * Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN * Document 763 * Filed 08/10/22 * Page 27 of 197 **Page Content:** 1. Transcript at 2174 to 76 and 2194 to 95, I'll sustain. 2. I sustained two objections to continuing question on this issue. Statement was read aloud and the defense made and can make its impeachment argument. 3. 2182 to 83, sustained. The statement was read aloud. 4. 2185 to 86, sustained. The statement was read aloud 5. and there is no inconsistency as I previously ruled at 2186. 6. 2195, sustained for the same reasons I just indicated. 7. 2197 and 98, sustained. Annie did not earlier characterize Ms. Maxwell as, quote, disinterested, but that's not an inconsistency. Further, Annie had no opportunity to explain or deny the statement or lack thereof. 8. 2209 to 13, sustained. There isn't an inconsistency and Annie answered, "I don't recall." 9. 2224, sustained. 10. I think that's it. And just on that last one, it was read aloud and I don't see an inference of inconsistency. 11. Anything else on that? 12. MS. COMEY: No, your Honor. 13. THE COURT: Ms. Menninger? 14. MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. 15. THE COURT: Again, recognizing that the parties had agreed on others. 16. MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. Just with respect to one thing your Honor just said, because the statement was read **Footer:** * SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. * (212) 805-0300 * DOJ-OGR-00016756