EFTA01136762.pdf
dataset_9 pdf 667.8 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 5 pages
Eye on the Market April 1 2013 J.P Morgan
Topics: American vs European Roulette, rising US equity markets and continued European underpeformance
Compared to Europe, the US is running easier monetary and fiscal policy, and playing a game of American Roulette:
gambling that eventual withdrawals will take place at a time of higher growth, and will thus be less disruptive. On fiscal policy,
after the cyclical increase in tax receipts and decline in unemployment insurance, the US fiscal deficit is projected to be —5.5%
by the end of 2013. Assuming the sequester remains in place and interest rates remain low, CBO projects a deficit of 3.7% for
2014 and 2.5% for 2015, with debt stabilizing at -75% of GDP. However, in 2015, mandatory entitlement spending and interest
start to grow more rapidly. The US is tabling this issue to another day; US equity markets seem to like the idea.
There is evidence that with the help of easy money, the US private sector is recovering. As shown below, household debt
service has declined to 1990 levels, and the number of consumers using credit is rising again (from a low base). Modest payroll
gains and fewer jobless claims have contributed to rising auto sales and consumer spending; this is a mild surprise given recent
increases in payroll and income tax rates. Housing is on the mend (particularly in states worst-hit by the crisis), and inventories
continue to decline. Home sales and home prices are rising in most locations, which are driving furniture and building supply
sales. By the end of 2013, the % of Americans with underwater mortgages should decline below 20% from 35%4- at the peak.
However, housing is improving off such a low base that the contribution to GDP from residential construction is only -0.5%.
And while labor markets are getting better, they are not showing the substantial improvement the Fed cites as the criteria for
ending its asset purchases. As a result, the Fed is adding to its 50 Trades of Grey ($2.5 trillion of US Treasury and Agency
purchases and counting, measured in 10-year equivalents). We expect GDP growth of -2.5% by the end of the year.
US household debt service Percent of consumers Increasing debt US vs. European employment
Percent of disposable income balances (ex-student loans) Percent change,030. saar
14.0% 4%
13.5% 44%
2%
13.0%
40%
12.5%
36% 2%
12.0%
11.5% -4%
32%
11.0% 6%
10.5% 28% • • • . • • -8%
1980 1990 2000 2010 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Source: Federal Reserve Board. Sour e: FRB of KC. Empirical Research Partners. Source:BLS. Eurostat.
US initial jobless claims US auto sales Real Personal Consumption
4-week moving average, thousands Millions, saar Expenditures, 3-mo. °/* change-annualized
750 22 - 6%
20 - 4%
650 •
18- 2%
550 • 16
0O/
450 • 14
-2%
12 -
350 -4%
10 -
250 • 8 • 6%
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Sou ce: Department& Labor. Source: Autodata Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis.
US housing Inventory Is steadily AZ, NV, FL & CA: Phoenix rising Fifty Trades of Grey: Fed purchases of
declining, Million units Percentchange,YoY Treasuries and Agencies, a/c, of total net
9 80 20 supply issued (in 10-yr equivalents, 6mm a)
Real estate owned (REO Real estate related
60 employmeM 15 70%
7 10 60%-
40
6 5
5 Foreclosure 20 50%-
0
4 -5 40%-
60+ days
3 delinquent -I0 30%-
Building
2 -40 permits -15 20% •
1 Homes for sale -60 F -20 10% •
0 H
2000 2001 2003 2005 2006 2008 2010 2011 -80 -25 0%
Source: J.P. Morgan Securities Loan 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2009 20 0 2011 012 2013
Per to rmance. MBA. Soiree: BLS, Census, Empiical Research Partners. Source Nomu a Securit•es.J.P. org n Securities.
EFTA01136762
Eye on the Market I April 1, 2013 J.P.Morgan
Topics: American vs European Roulette, rising US equity markets and continued European underpeformance
US business conditions are also improving, after pausing last fall during the elections and fiscal cliff debates. Spending on
equipment and software is rising, and durable goods orders are headed in the right direction. Capacity utilization is almost back
to normal, and the number of private establishments is growing, a sign that the US private sector has a pulse. Commercial
real estate transactions are picking up, along with a revival in securitized lending through commercial real estate and C&I loans.
US business spending on equipment Business spending: durable goods US production capacity utilization
and software, Billions, Real 2005 USD orders, USD, bn, non-defense ex-aircraft Percent, total Industry
1,200 70 - 85%
1.100
1.000 65 -
80%
900 60 -
800 75%
700 55 -
600 50 H 70%
500
400 45 65%
1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis. Source: Census Bureau. Source: Federal Reserve Board.
Number of private establishments Commercial real estate transaction Gross CLO and CMBS issuance
Percent change. YoY volume is rising, Billions, USD Billions. USD
3.0% 160 250
2.5% 140
2.0% • 200
120 150
1.5% • 100 • ■ CMBS
II Lai
1.0%
80 • ■ CLO
0.5% 100 •
0.0% 60 •
-0.5% 40 • 50
•1.0% 20 •
•1.5% 0- 0•L
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 '01 '02 '03 '04'05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics. Source: Real Capital Anatytics. Source: Bridgewater.
These are the improvements that rallying equity markets anticipated: as shown in the first below, P/E multiples on the
S&P 500 rose over the last year despite falling earnings growth. Earnings expectations for 2013 have been falling across
most sectors, and may weaken further before year-end; and the ratio of negative to positive earnings guidance is at its highest
level in three years. Consequently, the latest positive economic news may be mostly a validation of the market's prior advance.
While growth is still weak compared to prior recoveries, the recession that the Economic Cycle Research Institute was so sure
about for 2012 never happened. We felt that 2012 and 2013 would be one of those anomalous years when equity markets would
do better than what growth conditions alone would imply; this view still seems to be on track as the S&P 500 hits new highs.
Better economic conditions may eventually drive households and corporations to reduce their cash holdings, which are still close
to the highest levels on record. The Fed won't be making it easy for holders of cash: short-term policy rates may not rise until
2015-2016. Overall, no change to the benign view we outlined for US economics and markets in our 2013 Outlook.
Multiples rising, earnings expectations falling Lots of cash, everywhere
Forward P/E ratio 2013 exp earnings growth, YoY Household and corporate cash balances.% of tangible assets
14.0x 13.0% 28
Expected 2013
13.5x earnings growth
- 12.0%
13.0x 24
• 11.0%
12.5x
12.0x - Forward 20 •
PIE ratio
11.5x
11.0x 16
Jan-12 Apr-12 Jul-12 Oct-12 Jan-13 1952 1962 1972 1982 1992 2002 2012
Source: Bloomberg, Factsel. So rce: Federal Reserve.
EFTA01136763
Eye on the Market April 1.2013 J.P.Morgan
Topics: American vs European Roulette, rising US equity markets and continued European underpeformance
Roulette: the European Version. The $13 billion bailout in Cyprus is small (in 2011, France and Germany made $80 billion of
loans and grants to developing countries) and the situation is in many ways unique. However, the latest melodrama reinforces
the inconsistent and chaotic nature of EU policy-making. Bondholders, equity investors, bank depositors and citizens of Europe
are at risk of unpredictable outcomes as they play Eurozone Roulette. Here's where they might land on any given spin:
Depositor confiscation and Defenestration ofyour Prime
subordination: The EU Minister: As in the Prague
eventually backed off, but the defenestration of 1618, when
initial proposal for Cyprus the imperial governor was
involved a confiscatory tax on thrown out of a window.
small and large Cyprus Circumstances will never be
depositors, both foreign and known with certainty, but it is
domestic, with no loss to clear that the EU put enormous
senior bond-holders pressure on Italian Prime
(effectively subordinating the Minster Berlusconi. In August
depositors). It was a 2011, ECB President Trichet
shocking policy proposal in a sent a letter to Berlusconi
region where confidence is asking for a long list of reforms
everything: uninsured bank and a balanced budget in
deposits range from 45% exchange for the ECB's bond
(Spain, Germany) to 80% purchasing program.
(UK, Italy) of total bank Berlusconi's responses were
deposits. Note: Laiki bank seen as inadequate by other EU
branches in the UK were not leaders, and Italian spreads
subject to deposit withdrawal widened further. Berlusconi
restrictions, even though their lost the support of the Liga
branches in Cyprus were. Norte, and was forced to resign.
Circumstances were not that
Zero risk weight applied to
different in Greece, where
sovereign bonds: Even after
Papandreou resigned in favor of
Greek bonds suffered
a unity government that would
principal losses, EU banks
execute EU-sought structural
have the flexibility to use 0% risk weights on EU sovereign
reforms, and in Spain, where
debt as per "IRB permanent partial use rules", regardless of the country's credit rating.
Zapatero stepped aside to allow
Maastricht Ja/Nein!!!: From the inception of the Maastricht treaty in 1992 to 2008, there was not a for early elections.
single year when both France and Germany were in compliance with Maastricht debt and deficit targets.
Today, Southern Europe is pushed to get in line ASAP.
Loss of tax rate sovereignty: Throughout all the difficult negotiations and bailouts, Ireland was able to keep its 12.5% corporate tax rate
despite pressure from the EU to raise it. No such luck for Cyprus, which is being forced to raise its corporate tax rate from 10%. As far as I
know, homogenization of EU personal or corporate tax rates was never a condition for Eurozone membership.
Changing protections for senior bank bondholders: There is nothing wrong with bondholders, uninsured depositors or other creditors
suffering losses when they are owed by insolvent banks whose asset values are insufficient to cover them. In Ireland however, a bailout was
structured to avoid losses on some unguaranteed senior bank bonds which were subsequently repaid (a wealth transfer from Irish citizens to
bondholders). In Cyprus, some senior bank bondholders are no longer protected.
Tar Haven Designation: Germany's Federal Intelligence Service concluded last fall that an aid program for Cyprus would benefit certain
Russian depositors with billions of dollars in deposits in Cyprus, and that "Cyprus is a gateway for money laundering activities in the EU".
Fair enough; Cyprus is seen as a personal tax haven. But according to a US Congressional Research Service report in January 2013, tax
havens cater to both individuals and corporations. One measure of a corporate tax haven is when foreign sourced profits are very large
relative to GDP, such that in the words of the CRS, "profits in these countries do not appear to derivefrom economic motives related to
productive inputs or markets, but rather reflect income easily transferred to low-tax jurisdictions". On this measure, Luxembourg leads the
pack at 18% of GDP, 2x higher than Cyprus and 6x higher than Switzerland, Singapore and Panama. The degree, time and place of EU
concern about tax havens can vary substantially.
ECB asserts preferred creditor status: The ECB owned -50 billion Euros of Greek sovereign debt that was not restructured along with the
private sector. Typically, preferred creditor status is reserved only for entities like the IMF and World Bank.
Proposed bonus caps on stand-alone asset managementfirms and UCITS funds (including regulated hedge funds): Because their
investment activities played such a large role in the EU sovereign debt crisis? Because they were beneficiaries of official sector deposit
insurance and lots of ECB lending? I can't find evidence of either one happening, but maybe I am not looking hard enough.
3
EFTA01136764
Eye on the Market April 1, 2013 J.P Morgan
Topics: American vs European Roulette, rising US equity markets and continued European underpeformance
OK, enough about Cyprus. The bigger issue is that long-term Equity market returns by region
growth conditions in Spain, Italy and France are as weak as
they have been (other than during wartime) in over a rear to date 2007-2012
century, as we first showed in October of last year and again US$ Local Cur USS Local Cur
last February. The chart below tells the story. While European S&P 500 10.6% 10.6% 15% 15%
sovereign debt spreads have rallied across the board, European
bank lending to households and businesses is still declining, and MSCI Europe 2.8% 7.1% -5% -4%
the cost of small business loans in Italy and Spain is higher than MSCI EMU -0.6% 2.4% -17% -17%
both real and nominal growth. That may explain why European Euro Stoxx -2.8% 0.0% -17% -17%
equity markets' are still trailing US counterparts (see table). As
for Japan, we had a piece on March 18i° that walked through MSCI Japan 11.8% 21.6% -22% -44%
Nikkei 9.4% 19.5% -7% -33%
why we believe its equity markets may keep rising this year
despite economic data that is still pretty weak: some data is so MSCI EM -1.8% -0.7% 36% 39%
bad (deflation actually worsened in February) that it may lead to
Source: Bloonte 9. Data as of March 28, 2013.
a seismic shift in monetary and fiscal policy. On Emerging
Market equities, this year's returns are a disappointment, although
over most longer-term time horizons, they have generated better returns.
Michael Cembalest
J.P. Morgan Asset Management
Current long-term growth rates in France, Italy and Spain: That 19th Century Feeling
Change in 7-year real GDP, percent. since 1820; WWI, WWII and Spanish Civil War excluded
60%
[World Wars: mobilization, destruction & rebuilding
— France
50% — Italy
— Spain
40%
30%
20%
10%
0/
- 1 0% 0
1826 1838 1850 1862 1874 1886 1898 1910 1922 1934 1946 1958 1970 1982 1994 2006
Sources:gal:60es on WoddPopuLation, GDPand Per Capita GDP .1..Iniversay of Groningen; Contarence Board. Bloomberg. Data as of February 2013.
France Italy Spain
FrancaTrussian war and impact a
• of tariff reductions on French
industry
W
Cumulative impact of 10-year
Franco-Italian tariff war. *Medi
resulted in a 60% decline in
• Caerihrow and eale of Queen Isabella II:
collapse Cl railway boom and imancial sector
Great Depression. worsened by
delayed mme by France to drop
bilateral trade
• Currency. banking sector and stock market
crisis:impact of "New World' grain invasion
gold standard
• Pan-European banking crisis: Baling
Brothers failure after Argentine govt default:
Pinllorera epidemic arrives in Spain
I There are two indices most often referred to as "European equities": the Eurostoxx 50 and the MSCI Europe index. They are quite
different. From a constituency standpoint, there is only a 26% overlap in companies included due to the higher concentration and larger
capitalization sizes in the Eurostoxx index. The other big difference is that the MSCI Europe index (which has outperformed in recent years)
has very large exposures to the UK (34%) and Switzerland (14%), while the Eurostoxx has none. As such, the Eurostoxx is a better
measure of the performance of Eurozone (EMU) equities, along with the MSCI EMU (European Monetary Union) index.
4
EFTA01136765
Eye on the Market April 1.2013 JP Morgan
Topics: American vs European Roulette, rising US equity markets and continued European underpeformance
BLS Bureau of Labor Statistics
CBO Congressional Budget Office
C&I Commercial & Industrial
ECB European Central Bank
FRB Federal Reserve Board
OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (France/Germany 2011 aid: OECD QWIDS database)
UCITS Undertakings for the Collective investment of Transferable Securities
"Tax Havens: International Tax Avoidance and Evasion", US Congressional Research Service, Jane Gravelle, January 2013
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tar advice. Accordingly, any discussion ofU.S. fat matters contained
herein (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used. and cannot be used. in connection with the promotion, marketing or
recommendation by anyone unaffiliated with JPMorgan Chase & Co. ofany ofthe matters addressed herein orfor the purpose ofavoiding U.S. tat-related
penalties. Note thatJ.P. Morgan is not a licensed insurance provider.
The material contained herein is intended as a generalmarket commentary. Opinions expressedherein are those ofMichael Cembatest and may differfrom those ofother J.P.
Morgan employees and affiliates. This information in no way constitutes1P. Aforgan research and should not be treated as such. Further. the views expressed herein may differ
from that contained in J.P. Morgan research reports. The above summarylpricedquoiesistaristics have been obtainedfrom sources deemed to be reliable. but we do not
guarantee their accuracy or completeness. any yield referenced is indicative and subject to change. Past performance is not a guarantee offuture results. References to the
performance or character ofour portfolios generally refer to our Balanced ModelPortfolios constructed by J.P. Morgan. It is a proxyfor client performance and may nor
represent actual transactions or investments in client accounts. The model portfolio can be implemented across brokerage or managed accounts depending on the unique
objectives ofeach client and is serviced through distinct legal entities licensedfor specific activities. Bank. trust and investment management services are provided by JP
Morgan Chase Bank. N.A. and its affiliates. Securities are offered through J.P. Morgan Securities LW (JPMS). Member NYSE. FINRA and SIPC. and its affiliates globally as
local legislation permits. Securities products purchased or sold through JPMS are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"): are not deposits or
other obligations of its bank or thrift affiliates and are not guaranteed by its bank or thrift refiliates: and are subject to investment risks. including possible loss of the principal
invested. Not all investment ideas referenced are suitable for all investors. Speak with wurJ.P. Morgan Representative concerning your personal situation. This material is not
intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale ofanyfinancial insimment. Private Investments may engage in leveraging and other speculative practices that may
increase the risk ofin vestment loss. can be highly illiquid. are not required to provide periodic pricing or valuations to investors and may involve complex tax structures and
delays in distributing important tar information. Typically such investment ideas can only be offered to suitable investors through a confidential offering memorandum which
fully describes all terms conditions. and risks. High yield bonds are speculative non-investment grade bonds that have higher risk ofdefault or other adverse credit events
which are appropriate for high-risk investors only. Investments in commodities carry greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. There are additional risks
associated with international investing and may not be suitablefor alt investors. This material is distributed with the understanding that J.P. Morgan is nor rendering
accounting, legal or tar advice. You should consult with your independent advisors concerning such matters.
Bank products and services are offered byJPMorgan Chase Bank. NA. and its affiliates. Securities are offered by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC member NYSE. FINRA and
SIPC and other affiliates globally as local legislation permits.
In the United Kingdom. this material is approved byJ.P. Morgan International Bank Limited (JPMIB) with the registered office located at 25 Bank Street. Canary IWtarf.
London EN 5JP. registered in England No. 03838766 and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. In addition. this material may be distributed by:
!Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMCB) Paris branch. which is regulated by the French banking authorities Autorite de Controle Prudentiel and Amorist; des Marches
Financiers: J.P. Morgan (Suisse) St. regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority: JPMCB Bahrain branch. licensed as a conventional wholesale bank by
the Central Bank ofBahrain (for professional clients only): JPMCB Dubai branch. regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority.
In Hong Kong. this material is distributed by JPMorgan Chase Bank. NA. (JPMCB) Hong Kong branch except to recipients having an account at JPMCB Singapore branch
and where this material relates to a Collective Investment Scheme (other than privatefunds such as private equity andhedge funds) in which case it is distributed by J.P.
Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited (JPMSAPL). Both JPMCB Hong Kong branch and JPMSAPL are regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.
In Singapore. this material is distributed by JPMCB Singapore branch except to recipients having an account at JPMCB Singapore branch and where this material relates to a
Collective Investment Scheme (other than privatefunds such as a private equity and hedge funds) in which case it is distributed by LP. Aforgan (SEA.) Limited (JPMSEAL).
Both JPMCB Singapore branch and JPMSEAL are regulated by the Monetary Authority ofSingapore.
With respect to countries in Latin America. the distribution ofthis material may be restricted in certain jurisdictions. Receipt of this material does not constitute an offer or
solicitation to any person in any jurisdiction in which such offer or solicitation is not authorized or to any person to whom it would be unlawful to make such offer or
solicitation.
Each recipient ofthis presentation. and each agent thereof may disclose to any person. without limitation, the US income andfranchise tax treatment and tax structure ofthe
transactions described herein and may disclose all materials ofany kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) provided to each recipient insofar as the materials relate to a
US income or franchise tar strategy provided to such recipient by JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries. Should you have any questions regarding the information
contained in this material or about J.P. Morgan products and services. please contact your J.P. Morgan private banking representative. Additional information is available
upon request. "J.P. Morgan" is the marketing namefor JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide. This material may not be reproduced or
circulated without J.P. Morgan's authority. 0 2013 JPMorgan Chase & Co. Ali rights reserved
5
EFTA01136766
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 252126a5-bc93-4940-a54d-41f2e24f7e5c
- Storage Key
- dataset_9/EFTA01136762.pdf
- Content Hash
- 03ae4fa30f300d554eb618bc52ab23f4
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026