EFTA00624921.pdf

Pg 2 . pre charge, a girl could not be a victim , what if charges are dropped. What if a prisoner makes a complaint In a federal facility. Not obnligaton to tell about indictment The federal nexus was never DISPRoven. / Epstein had a housein florida for 20 years.. he was returning or traveling to his own house.. main purpose to return to his home.. no sex alleged in other than florida The reason they attempted to find another charge that epstein would agree to is obvious. They felt they could not make a federal sex case.. so they were looking for an agreed non sex alternative. . All the girls received money in exchange . each and every one. The law is clear regarding the prostitution charge.. The govt demanded financial compentsation for the victims.. as part of any plea. The girls who benefited from that deal AFTER receiving the money , want to set it aside. Are they going to return the money? The girls were never sworn under oath, so the govt arguably suborning perjury by telling them that they would receive a financial payment if epstein was convicted . There was never a federal charge. Only a state charge. As the evidence of a state crime they felt was stronger . and they could not prove a federal nexus easily, phones ( epstein not using ) no trafficking.. no financial gain. Etc Having the fbi tell the girls that they would receive money if their story was good enough, before their allegations were thoroughly investigated would be unethical. The girls in the courtroom , if they had followed the cvra rules would have a make a habeus claim within 48 hours. They chose not to , in order to get their money Pg 8 Epstein plead guiltly to one girl . that is it. A list was prepared „ but only on the condition that epstein would not see it until after he was incarcerated. . Epsteins victims. . these were unoroven allegations . most not deemed credible bny the state attorney. Page 9, epsteins asssitants were accused of arranging appointments. . case law is now clear, not a crime. 10, no evidence of other people involved. Not one shred page 11. The 2255 requires a conviction. It is what they would have asked at trial. Here the girls received the benefit by agreement . never having to testify. Some girls on the list, never at the house at all EFTA00624921 12 „ they felt so unsure about federal nexus they attempted . to find a fed misdeamonor 13. the state prosecutor had sai d no real victims 14. the girls would receive money without allowed questioning by epsteins attorneys. No questions at all. 15. the agreement to pay money , without being able to challenge the girls , became an issue, to review up the chain. The agreement was not really binding until June of 081. the girls had been contacted to say that the investigation was continuming which was true , many interviews with new people. Page 20. They should emphasize assault on prosecutors. On one hand assault on the other " conspiracy ? makes no sense. Disclosing the benefits of a certain version of events , that might taint their testimony was agreed by both sides to be wrong Page 21. The indictment is a govt document. No one except the govt should ever see an unified indictment. 22, the travel was all intra state, prostitution is a local crime, no girl was alleged to have traveld acorss state lines 23. the govt was trying to protect their case. If it became clear that they told the girls they would receve money if they told a certain version of events .... page 24. It is clear by the octobler amendment that things were still in flux Their charge number 69. - epstein could not arrange for non notification . this is silly . the federal agreement was made a material reason for epsteins plea and given to the state judge. Again before he saw the list of girls. Page 31, and most telling, is that acosta agreed that the agreeemnet contained many signifigant irregularities re payment to the girls. Papge 32, the fbi continued to investigate , as the deal had been found wanting. EFTA00624922