EFTA00874485.pdf
dataset_9 pdf 729.0 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 10 pages
From: "Jeffrey E." <jeevacation®gmail.com>
To: Lawrence Krauss <I
Subject: Re: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting.
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 02:35:30 +0000
Inline-Images: DA866543-7401-4A5A-8E50-FD32E33A50EC.png
How silly that for six months I have repeated in as many different ways . Do nothing at all. !! That's it . You
have had me explain my intuition based on years of experience. I obviously did not do an effective job I'll be
there for you every day , no worries.
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:25 PM Lawrence Krauss S , wrote:
Yup
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 27, 2018, at 5:48 PM, jeffrey E. leevacation®gmail.com> wrote:
used to view
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 8:38 PM, Lawrence Krauss I> wrote:
So far probably slightly positive. Plus they view the publicity benefit as very important.
Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Origins Project at ASU
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State Uni
Research Office:
Origins Office Cynthia):
origins.asu.edu krauss.faculty.asu.edu
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 27, 2018, at 3:47 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.corn> wrote:
is origins a net positve money wise for the university or a negative. ONLY money
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:43 PM, Lawrence Krauss ce wrote:
EFTA00874485
yes.. you are correct.. but even without the attorney I wanted to try and assert my rights.. I got shot
down.. I expected to get shot down,
but nothing has changed in that regard. I have now dealt with this office twice, and they are aware of
the ongoing thing with Buzzfeed, and
as I told you before, the University attorney actually warned me this was likely to happen.
So, I think all is as it was with that office and they are going to do what they would have done anyway,
which is to interview my staff.. they
asked me on Friday before they got my note to send them the name of those who worked for Origins
from 2015 -2016 and I gave them the contact info for my business office manager at origins, and they
thanked me..
On Feb 27, 2018, at 4:38 PM, jeffity E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:
heres what this says. i lawrence krauss will tell you how i thinkyou should conduct your
investigation , if at all. and I would like to participate in it. repsonse. go fuck yourself. we will
not share the file , all complaints are proteced from defamation and you must continue to cooperate.
I wanted to add to his letter, to reiterate our concern about how your office was planning to follow up on the false and
defamatory third-party allegations from Buzzfeed. Because this was initiated by an online entertainment news outlet with a clear
agenda and established record of propagating false allegations about me, rather than by any of the individuals they refer to as
this should not be considered a credible
sources,
allegation worthy of investigation. I believe that our initial
discussion was sufficient to settle this matter. Whether or not you agree with this, there are two things
I think are important to establish.
Firstly, that the University should not propagate what can be false allegations from such a source by presenting them directly to current
and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their libelous agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this
would appreciate seeing copies of the
regard, I
correspondence you might send to current or former employees about this in the
process of carrying out and concluding your investigation.
your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on his February 23rd email communication to the Office of Equity and
Inclusion. I am writing to convey the University's position on its responsibility to conduct administrative
investigations into allegations of conduct that would violate institutional policy, if true. Because Dr. Krauss has
retained legal counsel,I am writing directly to you. You may forward my communication on to your
dient. Without having first secured y I did not think it was proper for me to copying him on
this reply.
Our policy on the Prohibition Against Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (ACD
401https://www.asu.edutaad/manuals/acd/acd401.html) and its accompanying procedures (P20 — link to the
procedures is embedded in the policy document) directs the Office of Equity and Inclusion to conduct prompt
and equitable investigations. Among the points stated are that the Office accepts anonymous
complaints as well as direct complaints. University employees are required to cooperate with any
investigation or allegations of violations of this policy. Providing false or misleading information or failing to
cooperate may result in disciplinary action. Individuals making a complaint or participating as a witness in an
investigation cannot be retaliated against. Any employee who engages in retaliation will be disciplined. The
EFTA00874486
Office of Equity and Inclusion does not make any findings until such time as it determines that it has
completed its fact gathering.
participants in an administrative
Our courts recognize that
investigation have a privilege against a defamation
charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz. 335, 681P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court
recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of discrimination filed with the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission was absolutely privileged. In Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees, 174 Ariz.
at 520, 851P.2d 240, 243 (Ct. App. Div. 1 1993), the court recognized the existence of a conditional privilege
for employees to report perceived acts of sexual harassment as public policy dictated that employees must be
protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v Maricopa County, 2009 WL 750225
(D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were cases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII.
In addition to its obligations under Title VII, the University must also operate its educational programs and
activities to be free from gender discrimination under Title IX.
The Office of Equity and Inclusion will proceed with its investigation as outlined in ACD 401and P20. The
Office will not provide your client with its investigative file. We look forward to Dr. Krauss's continuing
cooperation. Regards,
Dear Naimah et al:
Attached you will find a letter from my attorney, along with a letter he sent to Buzzfeed earlier in this week regarding the defamatory
and false story they were planning on printing. The story was then published yesterday morning. I wanted to add to his letter, to
reiterate our concern about how your office was planning to follow up on the false and defamatory third-party allegations from
Buzzfeed. Because this was initiated by an online entertainment news outlet with a clear agenda and established record of propagating
false allegations about me, rather than by any of the individuals they refer to as sources, this should not be considered a credible
allegation worthy of investigation. I believe that our initial discussion was sufficient to settle this matter. Whether or not you agree
with this, there are two things I think are important to establish.
Firstly, that the University should not propagate what can be false allegations from such a source by presenting them directly to current
and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their libelous agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this
regard, I would appreciate seeing copies of the correspondence you might send to current or former employees about this in the process
of carrying out and concluding your investigation.
Secondly, I reiterate once again that the Origins Project environment is supportive, candid, frank, honest, and productive, with all
employees being treated with respect, as well as being supported and mentor1. I am proud of our team, and I believe they feel the same
way.
Thanks for your attention to these letters.
On The, Feb 27, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Lawrence Krauss < > wrote:
Hi all:
I just wanted to clarify this further, in case it wasn't completely clear. I am not being represented
by Adam vis a vis the University investigation. He is advising me regarding buzzfeed issues in
case there is litigation required regarding Buzzfeed. So I haven't retained legal counsel for the
University Investigation. Just so you know. You should continue to contact me if there any further
questions, developments, etc. Thanks again.
Lawrence
EFTA00874487
On Feb 27, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Cynthia Jewett <1 wrote:
Thank you.
From: Lawrence Krauss [mailto
Sent: Tuesday, Febr M
To: Cy Adam < ; Naimah
Saadiq >; Erin Ellison
Cc: Lawrence Krauss <
Subject: Fwd: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting.
Dear Cynthia et al:
Adam forwarded me your note while on a plane. I wanted to let you know that you can feel free
to cc me on all communication or email me and cc Adam, as you wish.. Adam is advising me on
matters related to Buzzfeed, and so it is appropriate to communicate to both of us in this regard. I
expect he will be writing to you. In any case, I wanted to assure you that I will continue to
cooperate with all your offices, as I have done thus far. I value the collegial relationship I have
with all of my colleagues at ASU. I do hope Naimah's group has taken all of our concerns about
Buzzfeed under advisement, but I also understand the requirements on the University as well.
Thanks for your attention to this.
Best
Lawrence Krauss
Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Origins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Ph sics Department
Arizona State University, M.
Research Office: ant (Jessica)
Origins Office (Cynthia):
origins.asu.edu krauss.faculty.asu.edu
Origins Project 10 Year Celebration
Be a part of something 10 years in the making)
April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info
<image001.png>
Begin forwarded message:
From: Adam Waldman
Subject: FW: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting.
Date: February 27, 2018 at 12:28:21 PM PST
To: Lawrence Krauss <
EFTA00874488
Fyi
Just got back on wifi and reading now
From: Cynthia Jewett <
Date: Tuesday, February 7, 2018 at 31/1 PM
To: Adam Waldman
Cc: Naimah Saadiq <Naimah.Saadiq@asu.edu> Erin Ellison <Erin.R.Ellison@asu.edu>
Subject: FW: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting.
Mr. Waldman,
Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on his February 23rd email communication to the Office of
Equity and Inclusion. I am writing to convey the University's position on its responsibility to conduct
administrative investigations into allegations of conduct that would violate institutional policy, if true.
Because Dr. Krauss has retained legal counsel, I am writing directly to you. You may forward my
communication on to your client. Without having first secured your permission, I did not think it was
proper for me to copying him on this reply.
Our policy on the Prohibition Against Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation (ACD
401https://www.asu.edu/aad/manuals/acd/acd401.html) and its accompanying procedures (P20 — link
to the procedures is embedded in the policy document) directs the Office of Equity and Inclusion to
conduct prompt and equitable investigations. Among the points stated are that the Office accepts
anonymous complaints as well as direct complaints. University employees are required to cooperate
with any investigation or allegations of violations of this policy. Providing false or misleading
information or failing to cooperate may result in disciplinary action. Individuals making a complaint or
participating as a witness in an investigation cannot be retaliated against. Any employee who engages
in retaliation will be disciplined. The Office of Equity and Inclusion does not make any findings until such
time as it determines that it has completed its fact gathering.
Our courts recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a privilege against a
defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz. 335, 681P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the
court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of discrimination filed with the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was absolutely privileged. In Miller v. Servicemaster by
Rees, 174 Ariz. at 520, 851P.2d 240, 243 (Ct. App. Div. 1 1993), the court recognized the existence of a
conditional privilege for employees to report perceived acts of sexual harassment as public policy
dictated that employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey
v. Maricopa County, 2009 WL 750225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were cases concerning
discrimination and harassment under Title VII. In addition to its obligations under Title VII, the
University must also operate its educational programs and activities to be free from gender
discrimination under Title IX.
The Office of Equity and Inclusion will proceed with its investigation as outlined in ACD 401and P20. The
Office will not provide your client with its investigative file. We look forward to Dr. Krauss's continuing
cooperation. Regards,
Cynthia L. Jewett
Senior Associate General Counsel
EFTA00874489
From: Lawrence Krauss [mailto:
Sent: Friday, Februar 23 2018 4:19 P
To: Naimah Saadiq Cynthia lewet
Cc: Adam Waldman <1 ::.; Lawrence Krauss <I. >
Subject: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting.
Dear Naimah et al:
Attached you will find a letter from my attorney, along with a letter he sent to Buzzfeed earlier in this week regarding the
defamatory and false story they were planning on printing. The story was then published yesterday morning. I wanted to add
to his letter, to reiterate our concern about how your office was planning to follow up on the false and defamatory third-party
allegations from Buzzfeed. Because this was initiated by an online entertainment news outlet with a clear agenda and
established record of propagating false allegations about me, rather than by any of the individuals they refer to as sources, this
should not be considered a credible allegation worthy of investigation. I believe that our initial discussion was sufficient to settle
this matter. Whether or not you agree with this, there are two things I think are important to establish.
Firstly, that the University should not propagate what can be false allegations from such a source by presenting them directly to
current and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their libelous agenda, as Mr Waldman has
emphasized. In this regard, I would appreciate seeing copies of the correspondence you might send to current or former
employees about this in the process of carrying out and concluding your investigation.
Secondly, I reiterate once again that the Origins Project environment is supportive, candid, frank, honest, and productive, with all
employees being treated with respect, as well as being supported and mentored. I am proud of our team, and I believe they feel
the same way.
Thanks for your attention to these letters.
Lawrence Krauss
Dear Ms. Saadiq:
My name is Adam Waldman, and I am Professor Lawrence Krauss' litigation counsel. Earlier this week, I sent
the attached letter to Buzzfeed via one of their reporters named Peter Aldhous.
I am also in receipt of Mr. Aldhous' letter to ASU, which is a variation on defamation — both libel and slander
— that Mr. Aldhous and his colleagues have been manufacturing for at least 6 months (notably without any
reporting) in a campaign with a purpose known only to them. Buzzfeed's first method is to call or write third
parties, posit a list of fake, anonymous, recklessly false and malicious "allegations," and ask if the third party
has anything to add. Buzzfeed's second method is to seek tortious interference with Professor Krauss'
professional contracts, by writing third parties with whom Professor Krauss is in privity, present a similarly
inflammatory series of anonymous, recklessly false and malicious accusations, and then question: how can
the email's recipient allow such a person to serve on their board, or speak at their conference? The letter
from Buzzfeed to the University falls into both categories. There will be appropriate legal consequences for
Buzzfeed's actions.
It is my understanding that your office believes it is compelled by the above to investigate false, defamatory,
anonymous accusations posited by the online tabloid Buzzfeed by contacting third parties and potentially
rebroadcasting the tabloid Buzzfeed's accusations. To be clear, these accusations were not made to the
University by actual human beings who are alleging they were victims. There is no evidence they were
presented to Buzzfeed by actual human beings. Moreover, no present or former employees of ASU have
made any such allegations to your office, or to any office at ASU, to our knowledge. They are simply alleged
by a tabloid, and one that had yet published a "story" on the topic when they forwarded these to you. You
may propose to rebroadcast this tabloid's libel to other third parties who have also made no accusation
against Professor Krauss. I suggest that you consult with the University's counsel before taking so rash a step
as re-broadcasting hearsay defamation that came to you via an online tabloid under these circumstances.
Professor Krauss and I both recognize the absolute need to investigate real allegations. Some of the women
who have bravely come forward with personal harassment allegations against Harvey Weinstein are my
clients and friends. Some of these victims have been advised by me. Those actual allegations are entirely
distinct from a tabloid attempting to manufacture allegations to create harm.
EFTA00874490
Sincerely,
Adam Waldman
DISCLAIMER
Confidentiality Notice: This email, including any attachments, is being sent by or on behalf of the Endeavor Group
or Endeavor Law Firm; it is confidential and may contain information protected by the attorney-client and/or the
attorney work-product privileges. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this information is unauthorized and prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply email and delete this message and any
attachments without retaining a copy.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Any statements regarding Federal tax law contained in this e-mail are not intended or
written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under federal
tax law or to market any entity, investment plan or arrangement.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Adam Waldman
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 at 5:42 PM
To: Peter Aldous
Subject: Cease and Desist/Professor Lawrence Krauss
Dear Mr. Aldous:
I am writing as litigation counsel to Professor Lawrence Krauss. It has come to my attention that you and
Buzzfeed have engaged in an outrageous and protracted defamation campaign against Professor Krauss,
including both libel and slander. Buzzfeed's campaign has been malicious, undertaken with absolute
reckless disregard for the truth, and despite repeated disprovals of the falsehoods you continue to
harmfully disseminate. Your defamatory efforts have also been undertaken, for reasons known only to you
and your colleagues, with the intention of tortiously interfering with the contracts of Professor Krauss, and
Buzzfeed has unfortunately succeeded in this malignant purpose. We have both testimony and documents
from a litany of well respected third parties that provide overwhelming evidence of your and Buzzfeed's
malfeasant attacks on Professor Krauss. We are still tallying the damage.
You and Buzzfeed will immediately cease and desist from further defamatory statements regarding
Professor Krauss, and you and Buzzfeed will immediately cease and desist from any further efforts to
tortiously interfere with Professor Krauss' contracts. If you and Buzzfeed are unwise enough to ignore this
notice to cease and desist from the actions described above, the appropriate legal response will be swift.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, all legal rights are reserved.
If you have more harassing emails or any prospective communication you wish to transmit to Professor
Krauss, you are instructed to send them to me as he is now represented by counsel. If your or Buzzfeed's
counsel, whomever they may be, wish to send me a letter in response to the above, be aware that I may,
depending on its contents and because I would be obligated to forward it to my client, consider such letter
to also constitute a trigger of the above and react accordingly. Professor Krauss has suffered enough abuse
at your hands without commensurate consequences.
Sincerely,
Adam Waldman
DISCLAIMER
Confidentiality Notice: This email, including any attachments, is being sent by or on behalf of the Endeavor
Group or Endeavor Law Firm; it is confidential and may contain information protected by the attorney-client
and/or the attorney work-product privileges. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
EFTA00874491
any review, disclosure, copying, or distribution of this information is unauthorized and prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply email and delete this
message and any attachments without retaining a copy.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Any statements regarding Federal tax law contained in this e-mail are not intended
or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purposes of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under
federal tax law or to market any entity, investment plan or arrangement.
Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Origins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Ph sics Department
Arizona State University,
Research Office: I Assistant (Jessica):
Origins Office (Cynthia):
origins.asu.edu I krauss.faculty.asu.edu
Origins Project 10 Year Celebration
Be a part of something 10 years in the making)
April 5-9th 2018 - Visit for more info
<image001.png>
<image00 I .png>
Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Origins Project at ASU
Co-Director, Cosmology Initiative
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department
Arizona State University,
Research Office
Origins Office (Cynthia):
origins.asu.edu I krauss.faculty.asu.edu
Origins Project 10 Year Celebration
Be a part of something 10 years in the making)
April 5-9th 2018 - Visit for more info
cimage002.png>
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
EFTA00874492
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
Lawrence M. Krauss
Director, The Origins Project at MU
Co-Director, Cosmology Inkiative
Foundation Professor
School of Earth & Space Expl
Arizona State Uni
Research Office:
Origins Office (Cynthia):
origins.asu.edu I krauss.faculty.asu.edu
Origins Project 10 Year Celebration
Be a part of something 10 years in the making!
April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info
<image002.png>
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
EFTA00874493
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation®gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
please note
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may
constitute inside information, and is intended only for
the use of the addressee. It is the property of
JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this
communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited
and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by
return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and
destroy this communication and all copies thereof,
including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved
EFTA00874494
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 1cd9f409-6c44-48f5-8460-512e8a111ce8
- Storage Key
- dataset_9/EFTA00874485.pdf
- Content Hash
- 6ff3a339164b6dfb49e5cafb6c515528
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026