EFTA00971746.pdf
dataset_9 pdf 123.8 KB • Feb 3, 2026 • 2 pages
From: Tonja Haddad Coleman
To: Jack Scarola
CC: "Mary E. Pirrotta>, Brad Edwards < >, Maria
Kelljchian
Subject: Re: Joint Pretrial Stipulation (revised 9.27.13) for final review and approval for filing Edwards,
Bradley adv. Epstein (File #: 291874)
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 20:32:48 +0000
I have Brad's business card and documents that say otherwise, but we can agree to disagree. Here are the only
facts to which I will stipulate-
1. My client plead guilty to a felony that had nothing to do with any of Brad's clients;
2. Brad was a partner at RRA when it was conducting the largest Ponzi scheme in Florida history;
3. Brad's partner is serving 50 years for the Ponzi scheme.
You can try to prove everything else at trial.
Please send a final copy before filing.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 27, 2013, at 4:21 PM, "Jack Scarola" •=1=a , wrote:
Brad was never a partner and we will not stipulate that he was. We will agree to disagree, except that we will
eliminate the statement of facts to be read to the jury which I am also sure we will never agree upon.
Consequently, having been fully informed of our position on each of the proposed stipulated facts, tell us which
you agree to, and we will simply delete the rest. It will be a waste of time for you to try to reinsert anything we
have already rejected, so please don't try.
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 27, 2013, at 2:44 PM, "Tonja Haddad Coleman" MIEla wrote:
There were several changes made to which we do not agree; to wit:
The additions in the stipulated facts to paragraphs a and b; in e put back in that Edwards was a partner at
RRA- not just working there; we disagree with gin its entirety; add "partner" back into j; and what is showing
as a new j makes no sense as drafted- as if words were deleted and it was not reviewed.
Additionally, as I stated yesterday, the court order does not require a statement of facts to be read to the jury
so they should be deleted.
Thank you.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 27, 2013, at 1:20 PM, "Mary E. Pirrotta" wrote:
*** Privileged and Confidential Electronic communication is not a secure mode of communication and may
be accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney
Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18
U.S.C. S2510-2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under
Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the
EFTA00971746
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. Personal messages express views solely of
the sender and shall not be attributed to the law firm. If you received this communication in error, please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail or by telephone at and destroy all copies of the
original message. Thank you.
****** ************************************************************************ ****** ***
***
<Pretrial Stipulation 9.27.13 (revised 1 p.m.).docx>
* Privileged and Confidential Electronic communication is not a secure mode of communication and may be
accessed by unauthorized persons. This communication originates from the law firm of Searcy Denney Scarola
Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. and is protected under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. S2510-
2521. The information contained in this E-mail message is privileged and confidential under Fla. R. Jud.
Admin. 2.420 and information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copy of
this communication is strictly prohibited. Personal messages express views solely of the sender and shall not be
attributed to the law firm. If ou received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by
e-mail or by telephone at and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
EFTA00971747
Entities
0 total entities mentioned
No entities found in this document
Document Metadata
- Document ID
- 177f195b-2845-4d1e-8591-714cbbf15644
- Storage Key
- dataset_9/EFTA00971746.pdf
- Content Hash
- c7d0df2273fca7c384b639f784362c16
- Created
- Feb 3, 2026