EFTA01026191.pdf

From: Lawrence Krauss cza> To: Justin Candler <I nancy dahl < Cc: Lawrence Krauss <I Subject: Re: Appeal and Conciliation Committee Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2018 02:12:28 +0000 Suggested email to these people. Suggestions? To: Deborah Clarke, Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Michael, Crow, President Michael Searle, Provost Many thanks for your letter. I have several questions regarding the appeal process and conciliation committee process. I. First, when you say "each party", since there is no actual complainant in my case, who is the other party who will select a faculty member? 2. Can the conciliation committee recommend the dismissal recommendation be revoked and I be reinstated? 3. I have selected Prof. Kimberley Marshall as my nominee for the Committee. She is willing to serve, and understands the requirements. I have not discussed the case with her. 4. I will be lecturing in Mexico Sept 10-12 and cannot meet with the committee then 5. I am currently on paid leave, and I live in Portland Oregon and commute to ASU. I was informed by the Dean that this is not a disciplinary procedure and that I could come in to the office to get materials and this should not interfere with my work. However, all of my ASU accts are frozen, so that I have had to pay out of my own pocket for things like web maintenance, materials and supplies etc, and also had to pay out of my own pocket to fly down on two different occasions to meet with the OEI investigators. I would like to ask if my research accounts can be unfrozen so that I might be able to access them for my research materials, and also use the account that was set up to allow my travel to ASU in order to purchase air tickets to meet the committee whenever such a meeting is scheduled. ( I made a similar request of the Dean and the SESE office about this earlier during the investigation process but never heard back from them. ) 6. New evidence relevant to the OEI investigation has arisen. Some of this was contained in my appeal letter to President Crow. There is new evidence relevant to the allegation regarding Melbourne Australia. I am including the emails I sent to OEI in this regard with this letter. I don't know whether OEI will revise their determination based on this new information, although I believe they should. If they do, will this affect the process? Namely will the Dean be in a position to revise his dismissal recommendation? Either way, would it be appropriate to include these emails to OEI along with my appeal letter for the Conciliation Committee? Thanks for your attention to these questions. Lawrence Krauss I will attach the two recent emails to OEI.. Lawrence M. Krauss Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 twitter.com/Ikraussl I www.lawrencemkrauss.com EFTA01026191 On Aug 28, 2018, at 5:47 PM, Deborah Clarke <Deborah.Clarke@asu.edu> wrote: Dear Dr. Krauss, Please see the attached letter. Sincerely, Deborah Clarke Deborah Clarke, Ph.D. Vice Provost for Academic Personnel Professor of English Arizona State University Fulton Center, Suite 420 300 E. University Tempe, AZ 85287-7805 Phon Fax: <Krauss conciliation.pdf> EFTA01026192